On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 06:45:25PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote: > Separating "CREATE TABLE AS EXECUTE" from ExecuteStmt would be cleaner > but I avoided to change the syntax tree. Instead the attched make > distinction of $$.type of ExecuteStmt between NULL and "" to use to > notify the returned name is name of a prepared statement or a full > statement.
I am not so sure, and using an empty string makes the code a bit harder to follow. How would that look with the grammar split you have in mind? Maybe that makes the code more consistent with the PREPARE block a couple of lines above? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
