On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 09:31:24AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2021-Jun-08, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 2:51 PM Noah Misch wrote:
> > > > Not bad, but I would instead shorten the names to detach-[1234] or
> > > > detach-partition-[1234]. The marginal value of the second w
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 1:37 PM Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> Can we scan all the test names first and then pick a suitable length?
FWIW, I think this discussion of shortening the test case names is
probably going in the wrong direction. It's true that in many cases
such a thing can be done, but it's
On 09.06.21 03:57, Thomas Munro wrote:
test deadlock-simple ... ok 20 ms
test deadlock-hard... ok10624 ms
test deadlock-soft... ok 147 ms
test deadlock-soft-2 ... ok 5154 ms
test deadlock-parallel
On 09.06.21 04:51, Noah Misch wrote:
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 01:57:45PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
test deadlock-simple ... ok 20 ms
test deadlock-hard... ok10624 ms
test deadlock-soft... ok 147 ms
test deadlock-soft-2
On 2021-Jun-08, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 03:21:36PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 2:44 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> > > ... or we could shorten those file names. I recall an episode
> > > awhile ago where somebody complained that their version of "tar"
> > > co
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 03:21:36PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 2:44 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> > ... or we could shorten those file names. I recall an episode
> > awhile ago where somebody complained that their version of "tar"
> > couldn't handle some of the path names in our t
[Responding to two emails in one]
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 2:44 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> ... or we could shorten those file names. I recall an episode
> awhile ago where somebody complained that their version of "tar"
> couldn't handle some of the path names in our tarball, so
> keeping things from ge
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 01:57:45PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> test deadlock-simple ... ok 20 ms
> test deadlock-hard... ok10624 ms
> test deadlock-soft... ok 147 ms
> test deadlock-soft-2 ... ok 5154 ms
>
Thomas Munro writes:
> test detach-partition-concurrently-1 ... ok 553 ms
> test detach-partition-concurrently-2 ... ok 234 ms
> test detach-partition-concurrently-3 ... ok 2389 ms
> test detach-partition-concurrently-4 ... ok 1876 ms
> Any objections to making t
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 10:17:35AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 01:57:45PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> Any objections to making these new tests line up with the rest?
>
> No objection, as the output is still way under 80 characters.
+1.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Descr
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 01:57:45PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> test deadlock-simple ... ok 20 ms
> test deadlock-hard... ok10624 ms
> test deadlock-soft... ok 147 ms
> test deadlock-soft-2 ... ok
Hi,
test deadlock-simple ... ok 20 ms
test deadlock-hard... ok10624 ms
test deadlock-soft... ok 147 ms
test deadlock-soft-2 ... ok 5154 ms
test deadlock-parallel... ok 132 ms
test deta
12 matches
Mail list logo
