On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 06:56:57PM +0530, Ramanarayana wrote:
> Will it be helpful if the comments section of ExecuteStmt in gram.y is
> updated to include the IF NOT EXISTS clause.Something like this
>
> CREATE TABLE [IF NOT EXISTS] AS EXECUTE [(params, ...)]
Not sure it helps much. The other
Hi,
Will it be helpful if the comments section of ExecuteStmt in gram.y is
updated to include the IF NOT EXISTS clause.Something like this
CREATE TABLE [IF NOT EXISTS] AS EXECUTE [(params, ...)]
Regards,
Ram.
On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 03:31:05PM +0100, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
> Yeah, noticed the same thing myself while refactoring the CTAS code, but I
> guess the output could be like the current output for "EXPLAIN ANALYZE
> WITH NO DATA;", i.e. a top plan with "(never executed)" (see below
> for an exam
On 15/02/2019 09.14, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 09:53:59PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
Let's wait a bit more than the beginning of this week. I forgot about
this week's minor release, and it is too late to do something about
this report now, so we will have to wait unt
OK
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 09:53:59PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Let's wait a bit more than the beginning of this week. I forgot about
> this week's minor release, and it is too late to do something about
> this report now, so we will have to wait until the release had
> happened.
OK, committed
On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 10:31:35AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I'd like to get that addressed before working on the other item
> reshuffling the CTAS relation creation. Let's wait for a couple of
> days and see if folks have objections, and then revisit it at the
> beginning of next week. CTA
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 04:23:44PM +0100, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
> I added a test in create_table.sql where the test for the other form of CTAS
> IF NOT EXISTS is.
Okay, we can live with that. Instead of a scan on pg_class, I would
have switched to a more simple thing like that for the PREPARE q
On 2/6/19 12:49 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
A test case in select_into.sql would be nice. Should we back-patch
that? It seems to me that this qualifies as a bug fix, and I don't
see a reason to not support it knowing that we have the infrastructure
for that.
I added a test in create_table.sql
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 03:20:41AM +0100, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
> The first example below works while the second one is a syntax error despite
> that the documentation
> (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/sql-createtableas.html) makes it seem
> like both should be valid. I do not see any reason
Hi,
The first example below works while the second one is a syntax error
despite that the documentation
(https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/sql-createtableas.html) makes it
seem like both should be valid. I do not see any reason to not support
CTAS with both IF NOT EXISTS and EXECUTE at the s
10 matches
Mail list logo