On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 10:31:35AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > I'd like to get that addressed before working on the other item > reshuffling the CTAS relation creation. Let's wait for a couple of > days and see if folks have objections, and then revisit it at the > beginning of next week. CTAS IF NOT EXISTS is supported down to > 9.5 and is documented as such, and my proposal is to back-patch > accordingly.
Let's wait a bit more than the beginning of this week. I forgot about this week's minor release, and it is too late to do something about this report now, so we will have to wait until the release had happened. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
