On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 11:44:25 +0100
Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
> Michael Paquier writes:
>
> > - New functions introduced during a development cycle should use OIDs in
> > the range 8000-. See 98eab30b93d5, consisting of running
> > ./unused_oids to get a random range.
>
> There's bee
Michael Paquier writes:
> - New functions introduced during a development cycle should use OIDs in
> the range 8000-. See 98eab30b93d5, consisting of running
> ./unused_oids to get a random range.
There's been seen several fixups of this kind recently. Should we add a
note about this to th
On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 17:16:07 +0900
Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 03:56:11PM +0900, Yugo Nagata wrote:
> > I confirmed the patches are committed in the master branch.
> > Thank you!
> >
> > I've updated the commitfest status to "committed".
>
> This patch has been committed as
On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 07:51:06PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> So, are you planning to commit the patch? If not, I'm happy to handle it!
I have some time to look at the buildfarm today, so I'll just go do it
now. Thanks for checking the patch.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 2024/09/26 17:16, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 03:56:11PM +0900, Yugo Nagata wrote:
I confirmed the patches are committed in the master branch.
Thank you!
I've updated the commitfest status to "committed".
This patch has been committed as of 4eada203a5a8, and introduce
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 03:56:11PM +0900, Yugo Nagata wrote:
> I confirmed the patches are committed in the master branch.
> Thank you!
>
> I've updated the commitfest status to "committed".
This patch has been committed as of 4eada203a5a8, and introduced this
block in pg_proc.dat:
{ oid => '455
On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:51:33 +0900
Yugo NAGATA wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:07:22 +0900
> Fujii Masao wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 2024/09/10 17:45, Yugo NAGATA wrote:
> > > On Mon, 9 Sep 2024 22:59:34 +0900
> > > Fujii Masao wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 2024/07/02 16:34, Yugo NAGATA
On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:07:22 +0900
Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>
> On 2024/09/10 17:45, Yugo NAGATA wrote:
> > On Mon, 9 Sep 2024 22:59:34 +0900
> > Fujii Masao wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2024/07/02 16:34, Yugo NAGATA wrote:
> >>> So, I would like to propose to add
> >>> has_large_object_function
On 2024/09/10 17:45, Yugo NAGATA wrote:
On Mon, 9 Sep 2024 22:59:34 +0900
Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2024/07/02 16:34, Yugo NAGATA wrote:
So, I would like to propose to add
has_large_object_function for checking if a user has the privilege on a large
object.
+1
Thank you for your looking
On Mon, 9 Sep 2024 22:59:34 +0900
Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>
> On 2024/07/02 16:34, Yugo NAGATA wrote:
> > So, I would like to propose to add
> > has_large_object_function for checking if a user has the privilege on a
> > large
> > object.
>
> +1
Thank you for your looking into this!
I've attach
On 2024/07/02 16:34, Yugo NAGATA wrote:
So, I would like to propose to add
has_large_object_function for checking if a user has the privilege on a large
object.
+1
BTW since we already have pg_largeobject, using has_largeobject_privilege might
offer better consistency. However, I'm okay wit
>From af348b3629be07dd73fca5920f91b7309bc9d3b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yugo Nagata
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 15:12:17 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Add has_large_object_privilege function
This function is for checking whether a user has the privilege on a
large object. There are three variations whose arguments are combinations
12 matches
Mail list logo
