On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 at 11:23, Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> committed
Thank you.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
On 25/10/2018 05:43, David Rowley wrote:
> While doing a bit of work on a partitioning patch I noticed that it's
> not really that obvious that there's meant to be exactly 1 item in the
> partexprs List for each zero-valued partattrs element. Some incorrect
> code using these fields was the cause o
On 2018/10/25 13:13, David Rowley wrote:
> On 25 October 2018 at 17:05, Amit Langote
> wrote:
>> On 2018/10/25 12:54, David Rowley wrote:
>>> On 25 October 2018 at 16:46, Amit Langote
>>> wrote:
+* key,
one for each zero
On 25 October 2018 at 17:05, Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2018/10/25 12:54, David Rowley wrote:
>> On 25 October 2018 at 16:46, Amit Langote
>> wrote:
>>> +* key, one
>>> for each zero-valued partattrs */
>>>
>>> How about: for each ze
On 2018/10/25 12:54, David Rowley wrote:
> On 25 October 2018 at 16:46, Amit Langote
> wrote:
>> +* key, one
>> for each zero-valued partattrs */
>>
>> How about: for each zero-valued member of partattrs?
>
> Aren't arrays made up
On 25 October 2018 at 16:46, Amit Langote wrote:
> +* key, one
> for each zero-valued partattrs */
>
> How about: for each zero-valued member of partattrs?
Aren't arrays made up of elements? I did have "element" on the end,
but I
On 2018/10/25 12:43, David Rowley wrote:
> While doing a bit of work on a partitioning patch I noticed that it's
> not really that obvious that there's meant to be exactly 1 item in the
> partexprs List for each zero-valued partattrs element. Some incorrect
> code using these fields was the cause o
While doing a bit of work on a partitioning patch I noticed that it's
not really that obvious that there's meant to be exactly 1 item in the
partexprs List for each zero-valued partattrs element. Some incorrect
code using these fields was the cause of CVE-2018-1052, so I think
it's worthwhile to me
