On 2018/10/25 12:54, David Rowley wrote: > On 25 October 2018 at 16:46, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> > wrote: >> + * key, one >> for each zero-valued partattrs */ >> >> How about: for each zero-valued member of partattrs? > > Aren't arrays made up of elements? I did have "element" on the end, > but I didn't think it was worth having the extra line caused by the 80 > line length limit, so I deleted it. > > Seems "element" is mentioned 73 times in [1], but "member" does not > get a mention. > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Array_data_structure
I thought they can be used interchangeably, but perhaps not. Anyway, it's just that "each zero-valued partattrs" sounds a bit odd to me, especially because it you seem to be referring to the previous array field 'partattrs'. It would've sounded better with "each zero-valued partition attribute", for example, but again that's too long for the line too. Thanks, Amit
