Hi Laurenz,
Thank you for taking the time to review that patch.
Le lun. 25 nov. 2019 à 22:34, Laurenz Albe a
écrit :
> On Wed, 2019-11-13 at 16:48 +0100, Lætitia Avrot wrote:
> > So after some thoughts I did the minimal patch (for now).
> > I corrected documentation for the following tools so t
On Wed, 2019-11-13 at 16:48 +0100, Lætitia Avrot wrote:
> So after some thoughts I did the minimal patch (for now).
> I corrected documentation for the following tools so that now, using
> connection string
> for Postgres client applications is documented in Postgres:
> - clusterdb
> - pgbench
> -
Hi all,
So after some thoughts I did the minimal patch (for now).
I corrected documentation for the following tools so that now, using
connection string for Postgres client applications is documented in
Postgres:
- clusterdb
- pgbench
- pg_dump
- pg_restore
- reindexdb
- vacuumdb
You'll find it e
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 12:28 PM Lætitia Avrot
wrote:
> I do really appreciate that you took the time and your point of view is
> valuable to me.
>
>
I did not see your original mail from the 30th, we were talking about
apples and oranges. Sorry for the noise.
I have gone though that original ma
>
>
>> Maybe I wasn't clear enough. My point was using a connection string is
>> not documented. Here is PgBench documentation about dbname:
>>
>> > where *dbname* is the name of the already-created database to test in.
>> (You may also need -h, -p, and/or -U options to specify how to connect
>> to
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 11:38 AM Lætitia Avrot
wrote:
> Maybe I wasn't clear enough. My point was using a connection string is not
> documented. Here is PgBench documentation about dbname:
>
> > where *dbname* is the name of the already-created database to test in.
> (You may also need -h, -p, a
Hi Juan,
Le ven. 17 mai 2019 à 11:26, Juan José Santamaría Flecha <
juanjo.santama...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 9:16 AM Lætitia Avrot
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Given that, I think it would be a good thing to generalize the -d switch
>> (and maybe the --maintenance-db switch too).
>
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 9:16 AM Lætitia Avrot
wrote:
>
> Given that, I think it would be a good thing to generalize the -d switch
> (and maybe the --maintenance-db switch too).
>
>
Just a couple of quick comments:
Some of those tools user --dbname as a long option.
Most of those tools al
Hi all,
It seems my approach was quite candid because, of all postgres client
applications, some document usage of connection string whereas other don't.
Then, several ways of using connection strings are involved.
Here is a little digest:
| Postgres Client Application | Connection string syntax
