Hi Juan, Le ven. 17 mai 2019 à 11:26, Juan José Santamaría Flecha < juanjo.santama...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 9:16 AM Lætitia Avrot <laetitia.av...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> Given that, I think it would be a good thing to generalize the -d switch >> (and maybe the --maintenance-db switch too). >> >> > Just a couple of quick comments: > > Some of those tools user --dbname as a long option. > You're right. I checked and each and every tool that allow the -d switch allows the --dbname. So, of course, if -d is implemented for all Postgres client, --dbname should be allowed too. > Most of those tools also use the connection environment variables used > by libpq: PGDATABASE > Pgbench is documented [1]: pgbench [option...] [dbname] > Maybe I wasn't clear enough. My point was using a connection string is not documented. Here is PgBench documentation about dbname: > where *dbname* is the name of the already-created database to test in. (You may also need -h, -p, and/or -U options to specify how to connect to the database server.) Cheers, Lætitia
