Thanks for the feedback.
On 2018-09-22, Amit Kapila wrote ...
> ... Why can't we just extend the current Note where it is currently
...
Because information about how the protocol works belongs in the protocol
documentation not in the documentation for one implementation of the
protocol.
Th
on 2018-08-30, Fabien Coelho wrote ...
> ... Find v3 attached. ...
Hi Fabien,
As we're coming up on the end of this commitfest ...
Is the reviewer supposed to move this to "ready for committer" or is the
author supposed to do that?
Is the reviewer supposed to explicitly state "I've looked at
Hi Fabien,
Thanks for writing this up - in particular the psql backslash commands.
comments on the patch ...
1) I think that adding the "This privilege is abbreviated ... when
displayed." lines to the privilege descriptions is redundant. The
abbreviations are already listed after the "The ent
On 2018-08-27, Fabien COELHO wrote ...
> ... references to the protocol version lacks homogeneity.
> ... I'd suggest to keep "the vX.0 protocol" for a short version,
> and "the version X.0 protocol" for long ...
I agree. Change made.
protocol.v3.patch
Description: Binary data
an posted to
pgsql-hackers. So I
> decided to post to pgsql-hackers after posting to pgsql-docs. ...
OK, I think this is what you wanted.
Fabian's suggestion on making the removal more assertive is included in
the v2 patch.
On 2018-08- Bradley DeJong wrote ...
>On 2018-07-27, Tatsuo
