On 2018-08-25, Tatsuo Ishii wrote to the pgsql-docs mailing list ... > Hi Bradley, > Thank you for your follow up. Your patch looks good to me.> Can you please re-send your message in pgsql-hackers attaching to this thread ... > CommitFest app does not allow ... emails other than posted to pgsql-hackers. So I
> decided to post to pgsql-hackers after posting to pgsql-docs. ...
OK, I think this is what you wanted.Fabian's suggestion on making the removal more assertive is included in the v2 patch.
On 2018-08- Bradley DeJong wrote ... >On 2018-07-27, Tatsuo Ishii wrote ... >>... I think this should be mentioned in protocol.sgml as well. ... > > I agree. It is already mentioned as one of the differences between v2 > and v3 but an implementer should not need to read that section if they > are only implementing v3. (I know I've never looked at it before.) > > Using protocol.diff as a base, I changed the phrasing to be more > prescriptive for v3 protocol implementers (don't send a final line, be > prepared to receive a final line), changed passive voice to active > voice and fixed one COPYData -> CopyData capitalization. > > I also called this out in the description of the CopyData message > format because that is where the termination line would be > transmitted.
protocol.v2.patch
Description: Binary data
