Hello!
On 14.03.2024 17:57, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 5:37 PM Erik Wienhold wrote:
On 2024-03-03 03:00 +0100, Steve Chavez wrote:
psql has the :{?name} syntax for testing a psql variable existence.
But currently doing \echo :{?VERB doesn't trigger tab completion.
This
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 at 04:58, Peter Smith wrote:
>
> Hi Vignesh, I have no further comments. Patch v9 LGTM.
The v9 version patch was not applying on top of HEAD because of few
commits, the updated v10 version patch is rebased on top of HEAD.
Regards,
Vignesh
From 0850792d2d52368af9a54698c03543b4
Hi
Upgrade works when you have an existing Postgres installation with server
running.
If you run the following command then it will upgrade the
existing installation of postgre.
sudo dnf install -y postgresql13-server
But you don't need to execute the below commands as this will create data
direc
Thomas Munro writes:
> Oh, it looks like this new build farm animal "skimmer" might be
> reminding us about this issue:
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=skimmer&br=HEAD
> I don't know why it changed,
At this point it seems indisputable that 7d2c7f08d9 is what broke
sk
On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 12:39 AM Paul Jungwirth
wrote:
>
> On 4/30/24 09:24, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Peter, could you have a look at
> > http://postgr.es/m/47550967-260b-4180-9791-b224859fe...@illuminatedcomputing.com
> > and express an opinion about whether each of those proposals are (a)
> > good
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 10:40 PM Anton Voloshin
wrote:
> On 19/01/2024 01:35, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > I don't yet have an opinion on the best way to
> > do it though. Would it be enough to add emit_message($node, 0) after
> > advance_out_of_record_splitting_zone()?
>
> Yes, indeed that seems to b
On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 12:35:55PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> I should have given a simpler example:
>
> s1: local-attach to POINT
> s2: enter InjectionPointRun(POINT), yield CPU just before injection_callback()
> s1: exit
> s2: wake up and run POINT as though it had been non-local
Hmm. Even if
Hello, Matthias!
I just realized there is a much simpler and safe way to deal with the
problem.
So, d9d076222f5b94a85e0e318339cfc44b8f26022d(1) had a bug because the scan
was not protected by a snapshot. At the same time, we want this snapshot to
affect not all the relations, but only a subset of
On 5/5/24 13:53, Chapman Flack wrote:
The four STIGs suggest the same email address [5] for comments or
proposed revisions. I could send these comments there myself, but
I thought it likely that others in the community have already been
involved in the development of those documents and might hav
Hi hackers,
More or less by chance, I stumbled on a Security Technical Implementation
Guide (STIG, promulgated by the US Dept. of Defense, Defense Information
Systems Agency) for PostgreSQL (specific to PG 9.x, so a bit dated).
There is a rule in the STIG that pertains to PLs, and seems to get
ba
10 matches
Mail list logo
