Scott Ribe schrieb:
I've
never used a hammer to put in a screw.
So I guess you're one of those ivory-tower theory-purist academic types, at
least when it comes to home repairs. As a more practical person myself, let
me just say that sometimes a 3lb hammer is exactly the right tool to get a
scre
Joachim Wieland schrieb:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 07:09:43AM +0100, John Sidney-Woollett wrote:
Why not use an update trigger on the affected tables to record a
lastupdated timestamp value when the record is changed.
Surely this is simpler thanks computing some kind of row hash?
It depends o
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:24:33AM -0500, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Alexander Presber wrote:
> >> CREATE INDEX idx_main_subject ON pdb.main (lower(main_subject::text)
> >> using varchar_ops);
>
> > IIRC, unless you're
Chris Browne schrieb:
> There are other options out there that could conceivably change the
> price of compression, such as:
>
> http://www.lzop.org/
> http://www.quicklz.com/
>
> Of course, those are not as well known compression systems, and so are
> not as well trusted. Maybe worth looking i
Devrim GUNDUZ schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 13:14 +0100, Albe Laurenz wrote:
>> I have notified the packager and hope that the problem will be fixed
>> soon.
>
> After thinking about it a bit, I thought it is the only solution to
> prepare different RPMs per platform :-(
>
> Per this
Devrim GUNDUZ schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 15:39 +0100, Bernhard Weisshuhn wrote:
>> error: unpacking of archive failed on file
>> /usr/lib64/libpq.so.4;4576d3af: cpio: MD5 sum mismatch
>
> Please download the RPM from another mirror, or re-download it. I
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 05:26:22PM +0100, Harald Armin Massa <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now we just need fast, stable and native replication for " The Girl
> That Every Man Secretly Wishes He Was Married To!"
I want replication WITH that girl!
Any chance for 8.3?
bkw
--
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 09:41:55AM +, Rory Campbell-Lange <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it OK to use logical volume management to run an xfs partition
> hosting postgres data?
We use just that and it works splendid. It's very nice for adding space
and all that.
But I must admit th
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 03:34:36PM -0300, Rodrigo Sakai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'm focus on temporal databases (not temporary), and I want to know if
> anyone here is studying this tecnologies too. So, we can exchange
> knowlegment. Specifically, anyone who is trying to implement on
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 09:14:40AM -0800, CG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I could probably get even better performance out of the table, at the cost of
> a
> significant increase in table and index size, by chopping up the columns into
> smaller chunks.
>
> "Hello World" would yield
>
> 'h.e.l.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 10:27:20AM -0800, CG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...] I'd need to see if the space required for the varchar+btree tables are
> comparible, better, or worse than the ltree+gist tables with regards to size.
Please test this, I'm guessing (hoping actually) that having bazil
Just Someone wrote:
2 10K SCSI disks in RAID1 for OS and WAL (with it's own partiton on
ext3),
You'll want the WAL on its own spindle. IIRC a separate partition on a
shared disc won't give you much benefit. The idea is to keep the disc's
head from moving away for other tasks. Or so they say.
Kenneth Downs wrote:
I have been meaning to investigate it because it is the only system I've
heard of that makes the same claim that I do, which is to have
eliminated entire categories of labor through automation.
Have you looked at http://catalyst.perl.org/ lately?
IMHO it's "Rails done rig
Don Y wrote:
Hi,
I wasn't prepared to ask this question, yet :< but
all the talk of stored procedures, etc. suggests
this might be a good time to venture forth...
Humor me: assume I have done the analysis and *know*
this to be correct for my situation :>
I want to embed a good deal of the i
Guido Neitzer wrote:
So they don't contain line feeds or carriage returns and so the can't
be multi-line. If a mail client sends multi line subjects it does
something against the RFC and I assume with that, it does something wrong.
This is the theory in RFC 2822 as far as I understand it.
Arturo Perez wrote:
Any response to this:
http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3631831
Oh please! Can we skip this one?
Maybe on the advocacy groups, not on [GENERAL], pleze!
thanks,
bkw
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain a
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 12:18:05PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We have a need to rename some columns, but since we can't update both
> the database and the programs instantly, we'd like to temporarily
> assign both names to the same column while the updates are in
> progress. Something like
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 12:33:37PM -0400, Daniel Corbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I heard from a bunch of PHP guys that Postgres is total crap. Can
> anyone recommend a guide for migrating to MySQL?
Hello slashdot!
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP
18 matches
Mail list logo
