On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 10:27:20AM -0800, CG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...] I'd need to see if the space required for the varchar+btree tables are
> comparible, better, or worse than the ltree+gist tables with regards to size.
Please test this, I'm guessing (hoping actually) that having bazillions of
combinations of 26 (or so) characters (ltree labels) might be consuming
less space than having bazillions of substings in the database.
Or maybe some clever combination of both approaches?
If you find out something interesting, please let me know.
regards,
bkw
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
