On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 16:50, Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > With all the discussion and pg_upgrade, I saw no one offer to work on
> > > > it.
> > > > Does someone want to convert it t
Eric Ridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't think the OS X 10.3 betas are readily available (I've payed to
> be in Apple's developer program), so if you don't have access to 10.3
> but have some idea as to what would cause this problem with tas, I'll
> do whatever I can to help test.
I hav
On Sep 27, 2003, at 3:43 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Eric Ridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I don't think the OS X 10.3 betas are readily available (I've payed to
be in Apple's developer program), so if you don't have access to 10.3
but have some idea as to what would cause this problem with tas, I'll
do
"Eric B. Ridge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Were you ever able to figure out why 7.3.4 wouldn't build?
Didn't really look, since the 7.4 inlined version of TAS is a better
solution anyway.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)--
Eric B.Ridge wrote:
On Sep 27, 2003, at 3:43 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Eric Ridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I don't think the OS X 10.3 betas are readily available (I've payed to
be in Apple's developer program), so if you don't have access to 10.3
but have some idea as to what would cause this prob
if you execute 'select_gcc 3.1' as root it should change your default
GCC to a compiler that works.
That fixes the problems with -traditional-cpp v/s -no-cpp-precomp, but
it doesn't fix:
ld: Undefined symbol
_tas
eric
---(end of broadcast)---
TI
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Isn't Perl pretty ubiquitous on "Unix" now, though? Except maybe
> Unixware
I know that Solaris now has it included by default ...
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
perl ships on UnixWare (5.005, but that will change in UP3).
LER
--On Saturday, September 27, 2003 22:42:02 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Ron Johnson wrote:
Isn't Perl pretty ubiquitous on "Unix" now, though? Except maybe
Unixware
I know that S
$$$ -- I wasn't looking to purchase a programmer. :-)
Well sometimes it takes money to get things done. Personally I don't see
a big need
for pg_upgrade but there was enough people making noise about it that it
made sense
to make the proposal. Several people did come back and offer to cough
On Sep 27, 2003, at 7:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I'm not sure whether we are planning another 7.3 release or not. I'd
like to push forward to a 7.4 release, myself. Do you have any idea
when OS X 10.3 will be released? If it's further out than next month,
we could probably plan that 7.4 will win the
On Saturday 27 September 2003 09:45 pm, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >$$$ -- I wasn't looking to purchase a programmer. :-)
> Well sometimes it takes money to get things done. Personally I don't see
> a big need
> for pg_upgrade but there was enough people making noise about it that it
> made sense
>
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> perl ships on UnixWare (5.005, but that will change in UP3).
In what way? :) It won't ship anymore ... or upgraded?
>
> LER
>
>
> --On Saturday, September 27, 2003 22:42:02 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Sat,
--On Sunday, September 28, 2003 00:14:18 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote:
perl ships on UnixWare (5.005, but that will change in UP3).
In what way? :) It won't ship anymore ... or upgraded?
upgraded to 5.8.0
(sorry, should have
Ron Johnson wrote:
There's always the general point that C has more pitfalls (mainly
from pointers/free()/malloc(), and HLLs do more for you, thus you
have to code less, and, consequently, there are fewer bugs.
Someday, they're going to make a langauge called:
CBC, "C Bounds Checked"
No buffe
We are doing some performance testing among various databases (Oracle, MySQL
and Postgres).
One of the queries is showing Postgres lagging quite a bit:
SELECT count(*)
FROM commercial_entity, country, user_account, address_list
LEFT JOIN state_province ON address_list.state_province_id =
state_p
On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 22:19, Dennis Gearon wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> >There's always the general point that C has more pitfalls (mainly
> >from pointers/free()/malloc(), and HLLs do more for you, thus you
> >have to code less, and, consequently, there are fewer bugs.
> >
> Someday, they're g
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > > The reason that it needs to be rewritten in C is that it needs access to
> > > > internal stuff that the backend doesn't expose. (For example, the
> > > > transaction counter, end-of-WAL pointer, etc.) I don't think Perl woul
17 matches
Mail list logo
