"Scott Marlowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is less than a year after the last major release, 7.3.0 by the way.
Uhm. Wasn't 7.4 the last major release?
--
greg
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 09:01, Scott Ribe wrote:
> > Interesting, IBM is saying that the code is worth 85M dollars!
>
> Well... Actually they're saying: "we paid $85M for it, now we're giving it
> away, aren't we generous?"
Hey guys, after reading the article, I began a dialog with Lisa Vaas,
the a
> Interesting, IBM is saying that the code is worth 85M dollars!
Well... Actually they're saying: "we paid $85M for it, now we're giving it
away, aren't we generous?"
--
Scott Ribe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.killerbytes.com/
(303) 665-7007 voice
---(end of broadcast)
Interesting, IBM is saying that the code is worth 85M dollars!
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 00:19, Scott Ribe wrote:
> > I could be reading it incorrectly, but the paragraph was outside any
> > attributed quote:
>
> You are correct that the specific comment about pg not thriving was outside
> any quotes
The problem is that postgres has failed to thrive as a web based back end database.
Ever heard of
the LAMP soluton? Linux + Apache + Mysql + Php. Its unfortunate, but real. Its easy
to find
hosting with Mysql db, its not as easy (although getting more common I think) to find
hosting with
Pos
> I could be reading it incorrectly, but the paragraph was outside any
> attributed quote:
You are correct that the specific comment about pg not thriving was outside
any quotes. However, given the totality of the references to pg I think it
was a summary of some things Rivot said. As for the poin
Scott Ribe wrote:
That's because he's a marketeer, not a developer or a sysadmin. He only
understands market-speak.
No, I think he fully understands the relative position of PostgreSQL and its
level of use. Think about it, why did he choose to disrespect this one
particular open-source database o
Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 13:30, David Parker wrote:
> > In an article about IBM's releasing Cloudscape to Apache,
> >
> > http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1630856,00.asp
> >
> > eWeek says:
> >
> > "The developer community for Cloudscape now consists of about 80 IBM
> >
> That's because he's a marketeer, not a developer or a sysadmin. He only
> understands market-speak.
No, I think he fully understands the relative position of PostgreSQL and its
level of use. Think about it, why did he choose to disrespect this one
particular open-source database out of all the
On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 13:30, David Parker wrote:
> In an article about IBM's releasing Cloudscape to Apache,
>
> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1630856,00.asp
>
> eWeek says:
>
> "The developer community for Cloudscape now consists of about 80 IBM
> developers, Rivot said. IBM of course a
10 matches
Mail list logo
