Re: [GENERAL] Replication with non-read-only standby.

2016-07-12 Thread Nick Babadzhanian
uot; To: "Nick Babadzhanian" Cc: "pgsql-general" Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 11:00:05 PM Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Replication with non-read-only standby. 2016-06-30 15:15 GMT+02:00 Nick Babadzhanian : > Setup: > 2 PostgreSQL servers are geographically spread. The fi

Re: [GENERAL] Replication with non-read-only standby.

2016-07-06 Thread Sylvain Marechal
2016-06-30 15:15 GMT+02:00 Nick Babadzhanian : > Setup: > 2 PostgreSQL servers are geographically spread. The first one is used for > an application that gathers data. It is connected to the second database > that is used to process the said data. Connection is not very stable nor is > it fast, so

Re: [GENERAL] Replication with non-read-only standby.

2016-07-01 Thread Moreno Andreo
Il 01/07/2016 05:21, Venkata Balaji N ha scritto: On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:15 PM, Nick Babadzhanian wrote: Setup: 2 PostgreSQL servers are geographically spread. The first one

Re: [GENERAL] Replication with non-read-only standby.

2016-06-30 Thread Venkata Balaji N
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:15 PM, Nick Babadzhanian wrote: > Setup: > 2 PostgreSQL servers are geographically spread. The first one is used for > an application that gathers data. It is connected to the second database > that is used to process the said data. Connection is not very stable nor is

Re: [GENERAL] Replication with non-read-only standby.

2016-06-30 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 7:15 AM, Nick Babadzhanian wrote: > Setup: > 2 PostgreSQL servers are geographically spread. The first one is used for an > application that gathers data. It is connected to the second database that is > used to process the said data. Connection is not very stable nor is