Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL vs. MySQL vs. Oracle, 2005 report card

2005-02-16 Thread Ron Mayer
Tom Lane wrote: > Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 11:13, Ron Mayer wrote: >> >>>Fermilab did have contact information ("mail comments to:") at the >... > Right. The question is whether we can get them to update it. I think so... as mentioned earlier in the thread,

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL vs. MySQL vs. Oracle, 2005 report card

2005-02-16 Thread Tom Lane
Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 11:13, Ron Mayer wrote: >> Fermilab did have contact information ("mail comments to:") at the >> bottom of the page. Fermilab's a quite highly respected organization, >> so I think this page is probably trusted by many. > Wandering

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL vs. MySQL vs. Oracle, 2005 report card

2005-02-16 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 11:13, Ron Mayer wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Am Freitag, 11. Februar 2005 13:37 schrieb Marques Johansson: > > > >>A recent Slashdot thread on MySQL performance > >>(http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/02/11/038232&from=rss) > >>contains a comment mentio

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL vs. MySQL vs. Oracle, 2005 report card

2005-02-16 Thread Ron Mayer
Peter Eisentraut wrote: Am Freitag, 11. Februar 2005 13:37 schrieb Marques Johansson: A recent Slashdot thread on MySQL performance (http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/02/11/038232&from=rss) contains a comment mentioning the following Fermilab report from May 2003: They were apparent

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL vs. MySQL vs. Oracle, 2005 report card

2005-02-15 Thread Jim C. Nasby
They also say that mysql is free, which isn't the case for commercial applications. On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 07:36:44PM +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > On Friday 11 Feb 2005 6:07 pm, Marques Johansson wrote: > > A recent Slashdot thread on MySQL performance > > (http://developers.slashdot.org/a

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL vs. MySQL vs. Oracle, 2005 report card

2005-02-14 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 09:28, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Am Freitag, 11. Februar 2005 13:37 schrieb Marques Johansson: > > A recent Slashdot thread on MySQL performance > > (http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/02/11/038232&from=rss) > > contains a comment mentioning the following Fermila

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL vs. MySQL vs. Oracle, 2005 report card

2005-02-14 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Am Freitag, 11. Februar 2005 13:37 schrieb Marques Johansson: > A recent Slashdot thread on MySQL performance > (http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/02/11/038232&from=rss) > contains a comment mentioning the following Fermilab report from May 2003: They were apparently testing with Po

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL vs. MySQL vs. Oracle, 2005 report card

2005-02-14 Thread Shridhar Daithankar
On Friday 11 Feb 2005 6:07 pm, Marques Johansson wrote: > A recent Slashdot thread on MySQL performance > (http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/02/11/038232&from=rss) > contains a comment mentioning the following Fermilab report from May 2003: > > http://www-css.fnal.gov/dsg/external/fr