Hi,
Le Friday 19 October 2007 22:29:37 Steve Crawford, vous avez écrit :
> > Do we use that term? Normally for us it's "large objects".
>
> Perhaps we should add "LO" but the documentation does refer to the term
> BLOB though typically in the context of "The SQL standard defines a
> different bin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/19/07 14:36, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Steve Crawford wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> Tom Lane wrote:
Steve Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My vote is to add "Appendix I. Abbreviations".
It seems more like FAQ material than
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Steve Crawford wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> Tom Lane wrote:
Steve Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My vote is to add "Appendix I. Abbreviations".
It seems more like FAQ material than something for the manual.
>>> I prefer the manual. I would think
On Oct 19, 2007, at 1:20 PM, Steve Crawford wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Steve Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
My vote is to add "Appendix I. Abbreviations".
It seems more like FAQ material than something for the manual.
I prefer the manual. I would think the list wou
Steve Crawford wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Steve Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>> My vote is to add "Appendix I. Abbreviations".
> >> It seems more like FAQ material than something for the manual.
> >
> > I prefer the manual. I would think the list would be pr
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Steve Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> My vote is to add "Appendix I. Abbreviations".
>> It seems more like FAQ material than something for the manual.
>
> I prefer the manual. I would think the list would be pretty long and
> deal with lots of in
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:04:27 +0200
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 04:46:00PM -0700, Steve Crawford wrote:
> > ECPG - Embedded SQL in C ??
>
> Correct. And the PG part should be obvious. :-)
Pretty Good?
>
> Michael
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: C
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 04:46:00PM -0700, Steve Crawford wrote:
> ECPG - Embedded SQL in C ??
Correct. And the PG part should be obvious. :-)
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fi
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:28:30 -0300
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:59:20 -0300
> > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Thomas Pundt wrote:
> > > > Alban Hertroys schrieb:
> > >
> > > >> Isn't this just what the ABBR ta
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:59:20 -0300
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thomas Pundt wrote:
> > > Alban Hertroys schrieb:
> >
> > >> Isn't this just what the ABBR tag in html is for?
> > >
> > > Well, yes; according w3.org its purpose is to describe the
> > >
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:59:20 -0300
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas Pundt wrote:
> > Alban Hertroys schrieb:
>
> >> Isn't this just what the ABBR tag in html is for?
> >
> > Well, yes; according w3.org its purpose is to describe the
> > abbreviation/acronym inline in a document
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Steve Crawford wrote:
>> Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
>>> On 18/10/2007 22:26, Laurent ROCHE wrote:
>>>
No idea what GUC is, though !
>>> Grand Unified Contraption? ;-)
>>>
>>> Ray (who's just been reading Jules Verne).
>> It's Global User Configuration. But the confusion d
Thomas Pundt wrote:
> Alban Hertroys schrieb:
>> Isn't this just what the ABBR tag in html is for?
>
> Well, yes; according w3.org its purpose is to describe the
> abbreviation/acronym inline in a document using a title attribute:
Can you do that from a SGML DocBook source?
--
Alvaro Herrera
Alban Hertroys schrieb:
Steve Crawford wrote:
My vote is to add "Appendix I. Abbreviations". Don't know if it's
practical for 8.3 documentation but it would be nice to add even if it
only has a few entries as additional ones could be collected via the
user notes.
I suggest as a discussion start
Steve Crawford wrote:
> My vote is to add "Appendix I. Abbreviations". Don't know if it's
> practical for 8.3 documentation but it would be nice to add even if it
> only has a few entries as additional ones could be collected via the
> user notes.
>
> I suggest as a discussion starting-point the f
> I prefer the manual. I would think the list would be pretty long and
> deal with lots of internals terms.
Also the manual has more "reference" character; as we saw with GUC in
this discussion it is still possible to find a CORRECT definition of
them.
Harald
--
GHUM Harald Massa
persuadere e
Tom Lane wrote:
> Steve Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > My vote is to add "Appendix I. Abbreviations".
>
> It seems more like FAQ material than something for the manual.
I prefer the manual. I would think the list would be pretty long and
deal with lots of internals terms.
--
Bruce
Steve Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My vote is to add "Appendix I. Abbreviations".
It seems more like FAQ material than something for the manual.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched o
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Steve Crawford wrote:
>> Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
On 18/10/2007 22:26, Laurent ROCHE wrote:
No idea what GUC is, though !
>>
>> It's Global User Configuration. But the confusion does point out the
>> need for a reference.
> I think it is Gran
Steve Crawford wrote:
> Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
> > On 18/10/2007 22:26, Laurent ROCHE wrote:
> >
> >> No idea what GUC is, though !
> >
> > Grand Unified Contraption? ;-)
> >
> > Ray (who's just been reading Jules Verne).
>
> It's Global User Configuration. But the confusion does point out th
Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
> On 18/10/2007 22:26, Laurent ROCHE wrote:
>
>> No idea what GUC is, though !
>
> Grand Unified Contraption? ;-)
>
> Ray (who's just been reading Jules Verne).
It's Global User Configuration. But the confusion does point out the
need for a reference.
-Steve
---
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Steve Crawford wrote:
>> Is there a comprehensive (or semi-comprehensive) on-line list of
>> commonly used PG-related abbreviations used in PostgreSQL documentation,
>> mail-lists, etc.? If there is not, would such a list make a reasonable
>> one-page addition to the PG manu
On 18/10/2007 22:26, Laurent ROCHE wrote:
No idea what GUC is, though !
Grand Unified Contraption? ;-)
Ray (who's just been reading Jules Verne).
---
Raymond O'Donnell, Director of Music, Galway Cathedral, Ireland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
idea what GUC is, though !
Have fun,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Computing Froggy
- Message d'origine
De : Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
À : Steve Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc : pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Envoyé le : Jeudi, 18 Octobre 2007, 21h10mn 47s
Objet : Re: [GENE
Steve Crawford wrote:
> Is there a comprehensive (or semi-comprehensive) on-line list of
> commonly used PG-related abbreviations used in PostgreSQL documentation,
> mail-lists, etc.? If there is not, would such a list make a reasonable
> one-page addition to the PG manual?
I don't think we have o
25 matches
Mail list logo
