On 11/30/2004 5:27 PM, Mike Cox wrote:
Ultimately, the RFD is about providing a place for _Usenet_ PostgreSQL users
who have been neglected for quite some time. With the ease of posting to
the big 8 group, and the very large propegation, I can see why the
comp.databases.postgresql group will be ve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On 30 Nov 2004 22:55:00 GMT, Woodchuck Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Trying to sway the vote?
> There has been no CFV. During an RFD, he's completely entitled to try
> to persuade others people to vote yes or no when the time comes.
Both of you are under the il
On 11/30/2004 5:55 PM, Woodchuck Bill wrote:
Marc G. Fournier From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Harris) writes:
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
"If there was an official newsgroup for postgresql, would you switch
to using Usenet fro
Woodchuck Bill wrote:
>> ppl like PeterE, TomL, JoshuaD, etc ... the thread can be seen:
>>
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-11/msg01110.php
>
> Trying to sway the vote?
>
>
Well, you have to admit that for _developers_, email is probably better.
But remember develop
Marc G. Fournier From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Harris) writes:
>
>>"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> "If there was an official newsgroup for postgresql, would you switch
>>> to using Usenet from using the mailing lists?"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>>Trying to sway the vote?
>
> There has been no CFV. During an RFD, he's completely entitled to try
> to persuade others people to vote yes or no when the time comes.
I didn't say that he was not entitled.
> Bill, is it possible for you to dr
Marc G. Fournier From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>>On 30 Nov 2004 22:55:00 GMT, Woodchuck Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>wrote:
>
>>>Marc G. Fournier From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
>>>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>>>
Just as an FYI ... t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>On 30 Nov 2004 22:55:00 GMT, Woodchuck Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>>Marc G. Fournier From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
>>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>>
>>> Just as an FYI ... the latest RFD is for *one*
>>> comp.databases.postgresql group to be created, that is not-
For what its worth, I vote no.
I like the mailing lists. If having a newsgroup is beneficial, I say go
ahead and start one, but don't mess around with the mailing lists,
please. I really like the one or two digests I get in my mailbox everyday.
- Greg
---(end of broadc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Harris) writes:
>"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "If there was an official newsgroup for postgresql, would you switch
>> to using Usenet from using the mailing lists?"
>> As a side note, for those that do vote 'yes', please note that there
>> is an offic
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Harris
> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 9:50 PM
> To: Marc G. Fournier
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] [ANNOUNCE] USENET vs Mailing Lists Poll ...
>
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "If there was an official newsgroup for postgresql, would you switch
> to using Usenet from using the mailing lists?"
> As a side note, for those that do vote 'yes', please note that there
> is an official pgsql.* hierarchy gated from the mailing l
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Bill Harris wrote:
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
"If there was an official newsgroup for postgresql, would you switch
to using Usenet from using the mailing lists?"
As a side note, for those that do vote 'yes', please note that there
is an official pgsql.* hie
13 matches
Mail list logo
