[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >On 30 Nov 2004 22:55:00 GMT, Woodchuck Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote:
>>Marc G. Fournier From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in >>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: >> >>> Just as an FYI ... the latest RFD is for *one* >>> comp.databases.postgresql group to be created, that is not-gated ... >>> this means that those using it would not have the benefit(s) that >>> those using the pgsql.* hierarchy do, namely access to the wealth of >>> knowledge/experience of those on the mailing lists ... >>> >>> I had posed the 'who would use USENET' question on -hackers previous >>> to the poll, and the general opinion was "not in this life time" by >>> ppl like PeterE, TomL, JoshuaD, etc ... the thread can be seen: >>> >>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-11/msg01110.php >> >>Trying to sway the vote? >There has been no CFV. During an RFD, he's completely entitled to try >to persuade others people to vote yes or no when the time comes. >Bill, is it possible for you to drop the combative tone? It's not >that helpful to constantly raise the temperature of the discussion. Actually, I didn't find Bill's comment 'combative' ... :) as to 'swaying the vote' ... by no means, since few on the lists would know how/where to vote in the first place ... ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
