Roger Niederland writes:
> I stripped enough out of the database that it is only good for a test
> case. Here is a public url for getting at the database backup:
I've committed a fix for this:
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=e4e60e7b6125e77f679861ebf43cc6b9f9db
Hello,
I stripped down the original query to what is below. I am not saying
that the query below
is useful except to show an error I am getting in Postgresql 9.1.1 on
both SL6.1 (64 bit) and
Windows 2008 server 9.1.1 (32-bit and 64-bit). The error I am getting is:
ERROR: variable not found
On 11/1/2011 8:30 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Roger Niederland writes:
I extracted the tables from the database which generates the error above
I eliminated most of the columns such that this query still exhibits
this behavior to reduce
the file size. I have a zipped file from windows postgresql 9.1
Roger Niederland writes:
> I extracted the tables from the database which generates the error above
> I eliminated most of the columns such that this query still exhibits
> this behavior to reduce
> the file size. I have a zipped file from windows postgresql 9.1.1
> (32-bit) which is about 1.5
On 11/1/2011 3:54 PM, Roger Niederland wrote:
Hello,
I stripped down the original query to what is below. I am not saying
that the query below
is useful except to show an error I am getting in Postgresql 9.1.1 on
both SL6.1 (64 bit) and
Windows 2008 server 9.1.1 (32-bit and 64-bit). The e
Roger Niederland writes:
> I stripped down the original query to what is below. I am not saying
> that the query below
> is useful except to show an error I am getting in Postgresql 9.1.1 on
> both SL6.1 (64 bit) and
> Windows 2008 server 9.1.1 (32-bit and 64-bit). The error I am getting is:
Hello,
I stripped down the original query to what is below. I am not saying
that the query below
is useful except to show an error I am getting in Postgresql 9.1.1 on
both SL6.1 (64 bit) and
Windows 2008 server 9.1.1 (32-bit and 64-bit). The error I am getting is:
ERROR: variable not found