David Garamond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> What is "text + text" supposed to do right now?
>>
>> Nothing.
> Then are these bugs? (7.4.5 and 8.0.0beta1 give same results). Frankly,
> the current behaviour is quite strange to me.
CVS tip gives
regression=# select co
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, David Garamond wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >>What is "text + text" supposed to do right now?
> >
> > Nothing.
>
> Then are these bugs? (7.4.5 and 8.0.0beta1 give same results). Frankly,
> the current behaviour is quite strange to me.
>
> --
> =# select co
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
What is "text + text" supposed to do right now?
Nothing.
Then are these bugs? (7.4.5 and 8.0.0beta1 give same results). Frankly,
the current behaviour is quite strange to me.
--
=# select coalesce('1'+'0','NULL');
a
=# select coalesce('1'+'1','NULL');
b
=
Am Freitag, 8. Oktober 2004 12:57 schrieb David Garamond:
> What is "text + text" supposed to do right now?
Nothing.
> What about making "text + text" as an equivalent for "text
> || text"? Most strongly-typed programming languages do this. And MS SQL
> Server too, I think (CMIIW).
What would t
What is "text + text" supposed to do right now? It doesn't seem very
useful to me. What about making "text + text" as an equivalent for "text
|| text"? Most strongly-typed programming languages do this. And MS SQL
Server too, I think (CMIIW).
--
dave
---(end of broadcast
