Just to give everyone here a head's up as to what's coming: The developers
have long known that the size limit on tuple storage (particularly as it
affects the 'text' type) needs to go away, and that the existing large
objects (lo) are less than ideal as a work around. Jan Wieck has done
the inita
On Sat, 22 Apr 2000, Paul Dlug wrote:
> I thought TEXT had a limit of 8K or something around that size, I would
> need something larger.
You'd be better off breaking the text up into smaller fields. Another
option is to store a pathname to a file that contains the text of your
article.
Brett W
-> I'm sure this has come up before because it just logically seems like
-> others would have run up against this too. Is it possible to store a
-> large amount of text in a row/field? I want to store articles in the
-> database along with information about them, sort of a content databasing
-> sy
I thought TEXT had a limit of 8K or something around that size, I would
need something larger.
Stephan Richter wrote:
>
> At 08:19 PM 4/22/00 +, Paul Dlug wrote:
> >I'm sure this has come up before because it just logically seems like
> >others would have run up against this too. Is it possi
At 08:19 PM 4/22/00 +, Paul Dlug wrote:
>I'm sure this has come up before because it just logically seems like
>others would have run up against this too. Is it possible to store a
>large amount of text in a row/field? I want to store articles in the
>database along with information about them
I'm sure this has come up before because it just logically seems like
others would have run up against this too. Is it possible to store a
large amount of text in a row/field? I want to store articles in the
database along with information about them, sort of a content databasing
system. Can anyon
