Hi,
Rigth now I have less than one thousand of gif/jpg around 6 to 15 ko each. I guess I
can
go upper :-))
regards,
Gilles Darold
Chris Bitmead wrote:
> darold wrote:
>
> > I'm using Large Object to store images and displayed them on the fly. I never found
> > any problems and it
> > is very
Subject:Re: [GENERAL] postgreSQL for storing a database of
documents
On Tue, 4 May 1999, Mark Fleming wrote:
// That a good solution, but now that XML is starting to break off
it
// kinda puts PostgreSQL users at a disadvantage. We have to have
// static
] postgreSQL for storing a database of
documents
Ari Halberstadt wrote:
> Raphael Finkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Is PostgreSQL appropriate for a database of documents? I see
several
> >potential problems.
> >
> >
darold wrote:
> I'm using Large Object to store images and displayed them on the fly. I never found
> any problems and it
> is very quiet. "When Postgre starts using large objects it is going to make a lot
> of noise." ???
How many images are you storing?
--
Chris Bitmead
http://www.bigfoot.co
Hi,
I'm using Large Object to store images and displayed them on the fly. I never found
any problems and it
is very quiet. "When Postgre starts using large objects it is going to make a lot
of noise." ???
You can also generate XML on the fly or what you want with Perl or other CGI stuff,
simply
On Wed, 5 May 1999, Chris Bitmead wrote:
// > # 1. Tuples are limited to 8KB. I assume even the "text" type is limited
// > # that way. But my documents may be longer than that.
// >
// > This isn't a problem, I store all of my photographs
// > in postgres.
//
// How?
I pla
On Tue, 4 May 1999, Mark Fleming wrote:
// That a good solution, but now that XML is starting to break off it
// kinda puts PostgreSQL users at a disadvantage. We have to have
// static XML documents on on disk in order to use the format and have
// external search engines to search for content
Dustin Sallings wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 May 1999, Raphael Finkel wrote:
>
> # Is PostgreSQL appropriate for a database of documents? I see several
> # potential problems.
> #
> # 1. Tuples are limited to 8KB. I assume even the "text" type is limited
> # that way. But my documents may be longer
Ari Halberstadt wrote:
> Raphael Finkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Is PostgreSQL appropriate for a database of documents? I see several
> >potential problems.
> >
> >1. Tuples are limited to 8KB. I assume even the "text" type is limited that
> >way. But my documents may be longer than th
