On 4/22/2005 2:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Sven Willenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
We have a replication set up between 2 servers using Slony; both are
runnind PostgreSQL 8.0.1. The issue is that when updates/inserts are
made to a replicated table, the replication does not occur; apparently
this i
We have a replication set up between 2 servers using Slony; both are
runnind PostgreSQL 8.0.1. The issue is that when updates/inserts are
made to a replicated table, the replication does not occur; apparently
this is due to spi_exec somehow not allowing/causing the slony trigger
function to fire. T
On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 03:09:13PM -0400, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 14:43 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 02:24:57PM -0400, Jan Wieck wrote:
> > > On 4/22/2005 2:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >
> > > >Sven Willenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
Sven Willenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We have a replication set up between 2 servers using Slony; both are
> runnind PostgreSQL 8.0.1. The issue is that when updates/inserts are
> made to a replicated table, the replication does not occur; apparently
> this is due to spi_exec somehow not
On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 14:43 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 02:24:57PM -0400, Jan Wieck wrote:
> > On 4/22/2005 2:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > >Sven Willenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >>We have a replication set up between 2 servers using Slony; both are
> > >>ru
On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 02:24:57PM -0400, Jan Wieck wrote:
> On 4/22/2005 2:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >Sven Willenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>We have a replication set up between 2 servers using Slony; both are
> >>runnind PostgreSQL 8.0.1. The issue is that when updates/inserts are
>
