On 4/22/2005 2:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Sven Willenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:We have a replication set up between 2 servers using Slony; both are runnind PostgreSQL 8.0.1. The issue is that when updates/inserts are made to a replicated table, the replication does not occur; apparently this is due to spi_exec somehow not allowing/causing the slony trigger function to fire.
Yuck :-(. The only idea that comes to mind is that 8.0 changed the timing of trigger firing --- the triggers are probably firing while your function still has control, whereas in earlier releases they'd only fire after it returns. Could this be breaking some assumption Slony makes about the order of operations?
regards, tom lane
Slony triggers are AFTER ROW triggers. All they do is one SPI_execp() to insert the log row. The only way that could possibly be suppressed is by bypassing the executor and doing direct heap_ access.
So how does plperl manage that?
Jan
-- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== [EMAIL PROTECTED] #
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
