Re: [GENERAL] pg_repack and Postgres versions > 9.4

2016-12-20 Thread Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
At Tue, 20 Dec 2016 20:32:19 +, Gaetano Mendola wrote in > I wonder why this is not a VACUUM option. > > On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 at 15:30 Kenneth Marshall wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 09:15:51AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote: > > > > > > Does anyone have experience using pg_repack on Postgr

Re: [GENERAL] pg_repack and Postgres versions > 9.4

2016-12-20 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Gaetano Mendola wrote: > I wonder why this is not a VACUUM option. Because nobody has written the patch. -- Álvaro Herrerahttps://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@po

Re: [GENERAL] pg_repack and Postgres versions > 9.4

2016-12-20 Thread Gaetano Mendola
I wonder why this is not a VACUUM option. On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 at 15:30 Kenneth Marshall wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 09:15:51AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote: > > > > Does anyone have experience using pg_repack on Postgres versions > 9.4? > > Specifically 9.5, but probably 9.6 at some point. > > >

Re: [GENERAL] pg_repack and Postgres versions > 9.4

2016-12-16 Thread Kenneth Marshall
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 09:15:51AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote: > > Does anyone have experience using pg_repack on Postgres versions > 9.4? > Specifically 9.5, but probably 9.6 at some point. > > The documentation claims it supports up to 9.4. I haven't looked at it > closely enough to guess whether

[GENERAL] pg_repack and Postgres versions > 9.4

2016-12-16 Thread Bill Moran
Does anyone have experience using pg_repack on Postgres versions > 9.4? Specifically 9.5, but probably 9.6 at some point. The documentation claims it supports up to 9.4. I haven't looked at it closely enough to guess whether there might be changes in 9.5/9.6 to cause it not to work any more. Any