I wonder why this is not a VACUUM option. On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 at 15:30 Kenneth Marshall <k...@rice.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 09:15:51AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote: > > > > Does anyone have experience using pg_repack on Postgres versions > 9.4? > > Specifically 9.5, but probably 9.6 at some point. > > > > The documentation claims it supports up to 9.4. I haven't looked at it > > closely enough to guess whether there might be changes in 9.5/9.6 to > > cause it not to work any more. > > > > Anyone know? Or, alternatively, anyone have another option to get the > > same job done? > > > > -- > > Bill Moran <wmo...@potentialtech.com> > > Hi Bill, > > We are currently using it with 9.5.5 and it works well. I would expect > that it would work with 9.6 as well, but we have not tested it. > > Regards, > Ken > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general >