Re: [GENERAL] btree index on a char(8) field (fwd)

1999-10-08 Thread Gene Selkov, Jr.
Frank Mandarino wrote: > Thanks for your response. > > I knew from the programming documentation that the opclass was optional. > I'm pretty sure, although I will check again tonight, that I tried > creating the index without specifying the opclass, but I found that the > index was still not use

Re: [GENERAL] btree index on a char(8) field (fwd)

1999-10-06 Thread Herouth Maoz
At 15:30 +0200 on 06/10/1999, Frank Mandarino wrote: > main=> create index ven_code_idx on vendor using btree (ven_code char_ops); > CREATE I didn't have time to check this, but the problem may be caused by the incorrect ops you are using. For char(N) it should be bpchar_ops, not char_ops. Her

[GENERAL] btree index on a char(8) field (fwd)

1999-10-06 Thread Frank Mandarino
./fam -- Forwarded message -- Date: Sun, 3 Oct 1999 19:50:37 -0400 From: Frank Mandarino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [GENERAL] btree index on a char(8) field I am in the process of migrating a database from Postgres95 2.0 to PostgreSQL 6.5.2 on a Debian 2.1 system.

[GENERAL] btree index on a char(8) field

1999-10-03 Thread Frank Mandarino
I am in the process of migrating a database from Postgres95 2.0 to PostgreSQL 6.5.2 on a Debian 2.1 system. In a few of the tables, a char8 type field was used for the primary key, so I converted them to type char(8). The tables also had a btree index built on the primary key using char8_ops, wh