Re: [GENERAL] Postgres on Linux Alpha

1999-11-09 Thread Ryan Kirkpatrick
On Tue, 9 Nov 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Without these patches, pgsql will not run out of the box on > > Linux/Alpha. Hopefully it will in 7.0 a few (?) months from now. > > Why don't we apply this to 6.5.*. Not to sound annoyed here (long, long day), but we have been down this

Re: [GENERAL] Postgres on Linux Alpha

1999-11-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
> On Tue, 9 Nov 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > Without these patches, pgsql will not run out of the box on > > > Linux/Alpha. Hopefully it will in 7.0 a few (?) months from now. > > > > Why don't we apply this to 6.5.*. > > Not to sound annoyed here (long, long day), but we have bee

Re: [GENERAL] Postgres on Linux Alpha

1999-11-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
> Yea, run over to http://www.rkirkpat.net/software/ (my site) and > grab the Linux/Alpha patches for 6.5.2. They apply cleanly to the 6.5.3 > tarball, and when compiled, produce binaries that work great. Either that, > or go to http://www.ramifordistat.net/postgres/ and grab the SRPM and >

Re: [GENERAL] Postgres on Linux Alpha

1999-11-09 Thread Ryan Kirkpatrick
On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, Fabrice Scemama wrote: > I'm currently trying to install Postgres 6.5.3 on my Alpha ev56 > proc. I'm using gcc 2.95.2, and this is a glibc 2.1.2 system (RH6). > Everything's brand new, so as to maximize chances (hope). > I've configured --with-template=linux_alpha, and the mak