On 11/08/10 16:33, umut orhan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I've collected some interesting results during my experiments which I
> couldn't
> figure out the reason behind them and need your assistance.
>
> I'm running PostgreSQL 9.0 on a quad-core machine having two level on-chip
> cache
> hierarc
On 11/08/10 7:33 AM, umut orhan wrote:
Hi all,
I've collected some interesting results during my experiments which I
couldn't figure out the reason behind them and need your assistance.
I'm running PostgreSQL 9.0 on a quad-core machine having two level
on-chip cache hierarchy. PostgreSQL has
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 8:33 AM, umut orhan wrote:
> Hi all,
> I've collected some interesting results during my experiments which I
> couldn't figure out the reason behind them and need your assistance.
> I'm running PostgreSQL 9.0 on a quad-core machine having two level on-chip
> cache hierarchy.
Hi all,
I've collected some interesting results during my experiments which I couldn't
figure out the reason behind them and need your assistance.
I'm running PostgreSQL 9.0 on a quad-core machine having two level on-chip
cache
hierarchy. PostgreSQL has a large and warmed-up buffer
cache thu
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 17:37 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> brian stone wrote:
> > I never considered MySQL because I really DO need transactions. MySQL
> > also lacks many enterprise features we need; well they say they have
> > them but from my testing they are a bit under-cooked.
> >
> > I need
brian stone wrote:
> I never considered MySQL because I really DO need transactions. MySQL
> also lacks many enterprise features we need; well they say they have
> them but from my testing they are a bit under-cooked.
>
> I need atomic actions across an N number of application servers. The
> goa
I never considered MySQL because I really DO need transactions. MySQL also
lacks many enterprise features we need; well they say they have them but from
my testing they are a bit under-cooked.
I need atomic actions across an N number of application servers. The goal here
is scalability, which
On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 06:55 -0800, brian stone wrote:
> Are there any built in tools or 3rd party tools for distributing a
> postgresql database? I need an active active configuration; master-
> master with fail over. The project I am working needs to support a
> very large number of transactions
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 06:55:56AM -0800, brian stone wrote:
> Are there any built in tools or 3rd party tools for distributing a postgresql
> database? I need an active active configuration; master-master with fail
> over. The project I am working needs to support a very large number of
> tra
Are there any built in tools or 3rd party tools for distributing a postgresql
database? I need an active active configuration; master-master with fail over.
The project I am working needs to support a very large number of transactions
a second. It will eventually require a main frame, or some
If you'd like to get some more detailed information, there is a
Postgres-HA webinar on March 23rd that looks very interesting and
should answer your questions.
Direct Link: http://www.postgresql.org/about/event.347
-Daniel
On 3/17/06, Guy Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2006-16-03 at 13
On Thu, 2006-16-03 at 13:51 -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 March 2006 18:14, Alen Garia - IT wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are currently planning the deployment of our next generation
> > enterprise database and we are wondering whether or not PostgreSQL could do
> > the heavy lifting t
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 18:14, Alen Garia - IT wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are currently planning the deployment of our next generation
> enterprise database and we are wondering whether or not PostgreSQL could do
> the heavy lifting that would be required. My post is a little bit long but
> I hope i
Hope this helps:
http://www.postgresql.org/files/about/casestudies/wcgcasestudyonpostgresqlv1.2.pdf
http://www.postgresql.org/about/users
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Hi,
We are currently planning the deployment of our next generation enterprise
database and we are wondering whether or not PostgreSQL could do the heavy
lifting that would be required. My post is a little bit long but I hope it
will provide you with information to allow someone to provide a
On Jul 8, 2005, at 9:52 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to get information about the Scalability options
available for
PostgreSQL. Assuming you a database that has a huge volume of reads
and
writes happening, what options have you got to scale your database.
Many
commercial RDBMS'
Hi
I am trying to get information about the Scalability options available for
PostgreSQL. Assuming you a database that has a huge volume of reads and
writes happening, what options have you got to scale your database. Many
commercial RDBMS' allow the clustering of Database servers and some other
o
17 matches
Mail list logo
