Re: [GENERAL] Incorrect information about GIN-index in RUM's docs

On 15.11.2016 11:12, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote: På tirsdag 15. november 2016 kl. 08:48:37, skrev Oleg Bartunov mailto:obartu...@gmail.com>>: On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Andreas Joseph Krogh mailto:andr...@visena.com>> wrote: This item isn't valid, is it? * T

Re: [GENERAL] Incorrect information about GIN-index in RUM's docs

På tirsdag 15. november 2016 kl. 08:48:37, skrev Oleg Bartunov < obartu...@gmail.com >:     On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Andreas Joseph Krogh mailto:andr...@visena.com>> wrote: This item isn't valid, is it?   * There isn't phrase search with GIN index. This proble

Re: [GENERAL] Incorrect information about GIN-index in RUM's docs

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote: > This item isn't valid, is it? > > >- There isn't phrase search with GIN index. This problem relates with >previous problem. It is need position information to perform phrase search. > > RUM being an extention, and having inde

[GENERAL] Incorrect information about GIN-index in RUM's docs

This item isn't valid, is it?   * There isn't phrase search with GIN index. This problem relates with previous problem. It is need position information to perform phrase search. RUM being an extention, and having index-access-methods as extentions is new in 9.6, where phrase-search was introdu