On 15.11.2016 11:12, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
På tirsdag 15. november 2016 kl. 08:48:37, skrev Oleg Bartunov <obartu...@gmail.com <mailto:obartu...@gmail.com>>:On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Andreas Joseph Krogh <andr...@visena.com <mailto:andr...@visena.com>> wrote: This item isn't valid, is it? * There isn't phrase search with |GIN| index. This problem relates with previous problem. It is need position information to perform phrase search. RUM being an extention, and having index-access-methods as extentions is new in 9.6, where phrase-search was introduced, this isn't really true, or am I missing something? RUM is very good for phrase search, since it has access to coordinates in index, check slides from PGconf.eu (http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/postgres/talks/pgconfeu-fts-2016.pdf). Where did you find the citation ? https://github.com/postgrespro/rum#user-content-introduction I assume I read the item wrong tho. As it's phrased, it (for me at least but I'm Norwegian) seems like phrase-search is not possible with GIN, which it definitely is. So I assume the real issue, that this item is trying to point out, is that phrase-search isn't really /optimized/ with GIN, just syntactic sugar. And with RUM it is optimized, not just syntactic sugar. Am I correct assuming this?
Yes. I suppose the original explanation about phrase search in GIN is confusing and ambiguous. GIN supports it, but it requires additional bitmap heap scan and so it slower.
I fixed it. Thank you.
-- *Andreas Joseph Krogh* CTO / Partner - Visena AS Mobile: +47 909 56 963 andr...@visena.com <mailto:andr...@visena.com> www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com> <https://www.visena.com>
-- Artur Zakirov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com Russian Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
