Scott Marlowe writes:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This claim is utter nonsense. If you are having a problem it's not due
>> to the way regclass literals print. Please show a complete example of
>> something failing.
> Is it possible the OP has an "alter user set searc
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Luiz Damim writes:
>> After restore, default_value changes to
>> nextval('testtable_id_seq'::regclass) and INSERT's start to fail as the
>> sequence canĀ“t be found on it's schema.
>
> This claim is utter nonsense. If you are having a problem it'
Luiz Damim writes:
> Today I found a strange behavior after restoring a PostgreSQL database: the
> schema of all serialfields default values are trimmed out.
I don't think anything's being "trimmed out". It's the normal behavior
of regclass literals to not print the schema if the table (or seque
Today I found a strange behavior after restoring a PostgreSQL database: the
schema of all serialfields default values are trimmed out.
For example:
CREATE TABLE testschema.testtable
(
id serial,
name character varying(255),
CONSTRAINT pk_testtable PRIMARY KEY (id)
)
WITH (
OIDS = FALSE