As soon as its ready? :)
Seriously, we did a beta4 just before Linuxworld, and should be doing a
beta5 relatively shortly as things have starrted to quiet down ... Thomas
has his "two weeks grace" for docs, which will most likely start on the
15th of Feb, so we're looking at March 1st for a rele
Is there any idea of when is PostgreSQL 7.1 going to be released?
Thanks in advance,
Roberto "Wolfox" Amorim
> > Is it possible to obtain a list of new features which are coming with
> > 7.1 ?
>
> I *believe* that the todo list that Bruce maintains has those features
> coming in the new release, that are finished, marked appropriately ... at
> least it used to be that way, Bruce?
Yes, marked with a das
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Dmitriy Agafonov wrote:
> What's the release date for 7.1 ?
January 1st, or there abouts ...
> Is it going to have support for the outer joins ?
yes
> Are there going to be any performance improvements made (I'm
> particularly interested in data selection speed) ?
of cou
What's the release date for 7.1 ?
Is it going to have support for the outer joins ?
Are there going to be any performance improvements made (I'm
particularly interested in data selection speed) ?
Is it possible to obtain a list of new features which are coming with
7.1 ?
I'm sure these question h
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Let me ask. Could people who need to be up all the time dump their
> data, install PostgreSQL on another machine, load that in, then quickly
> copy the new version to the live machine and restart. Seems like
> downtime would be minimal.
>
Rsync to mirror a node first a
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 12:18:15PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Let me ask. Could people who need to be up all the time dump their
> > > data, install PostgreSQL on another machine, load that in, then quickly
> > > copy the new version to the live machine and restart. Seems like
> > > downt
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 12:00:59PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > Migration tools might ease the pain, sure (though I'd still recommend
> > > > doing a full backup before a major version upgrade, just on safety
> > > > grounds; so the savings afforded by a tool might not be all that much).
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 12:00:59PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Migration tools might ease the pain, sure (though I'd still recommend
> > > doing a full backup before a major version upgrade, just on safety
> > > grounds; so the savings afforded by a tool might not be all that much).
> >
> >
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Migration tools might ease the pain, sure (though I'd still recommend
> > doing a full backup before a major version upgrade, just on safety
> > grounds; so the savings afforded by a tool might not be all that much).
>
> What is needed, IMHO, is a replacement to the pg_u
Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> No, it's not - it's just not making assumptions like "enough space is
> present to dump everything somewhere" (if you have a multiGB database,
> dumping it to upgrade sounds like a bad idea), "the database server is
> running, so I can just dump the data" etc.
On e
Hi Lamar,
> I was afraid you'd say that. :-) As long as I can get questions
> answered here about the gory details, and without laughing too hard at
> my missteps, I'll see if I can tackle this.
I think you would make a lot of people very happy with this!
Sander.
Bill Barnes wrote:
>
> Oh, if only I could be so sanguine about my learning curve in matters of
> Linux, PostgreSQL, Enhydra, Glade, gnome-db, bonobo, HTML, XML, DHCP, NIS,
> NSF, DNS, ABC, XYZ, ETC, ETC, ETC.
>
> Bill
:-)
It's like I told a client about learning PHP (which I had had little
ex
Oh, if only I could be so sanguine about my learning curve in matters of
Linux, PostgreSQL, Enhydra, Glade, gnome-db, bonobo, HTML, XML, DHCP, NIS,
NSF, DNS, ABC, XYZ, ETC, ETC, ETC.
Bill
>= Original Message From Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> =
>Tom Lane wrote:
>> Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PRO
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) writes:
> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> You can always stick to Postgres 6.5 :-). There are certain features
>> that just cannot be added without redoing the on-disk table format.
>> I don't think we will ever want to promise
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) writes:
> > Will there be a clean upgrade path this time, or
> > yet another dump-initdb-restore procedure?
>
> Still TBD, I think --- right now pg_upgrade would still work, but if
> Vadim finish
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) writes:
> Will there be a clean upgrade path this time, or
> yet another dump-initdb-restore procedure?
Still TBD, I think --- right now pg_upgrade would still work, but if
Vadim finishes WAL there's going to have to be a dump/reload f
On 29 Aug 2000, Trond Eivind [iso-8859-1] Glomsrød wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 29 Aug 2000, Trond Eivind [iso-8859-1] Glomsr d wrote:
> >
> > > The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > On 29 Aug 2000, Trond Eivind [iso-8859-1] Glomsr d w
The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 29 Aug 2000, Trond Eivind [iso-8859-1] Glomsr d wrote:
>
> > The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On 29 Aug 2000, Trond Eivind [iso-8859-1] Glomsr d wrote:
> > >
> > > > The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
On 29 Aug 2000, Trond Eivind [iso-8859-1] Glomsrød wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 29 Aug 2000, Trond Eivind [iso-8859-1] Glomsr d wrote:
> >
> > > The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Miguel Omar Carvajal wrote:
> >
The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Miguel Omar Carvajal wrote:
>
> > Hi there,
> >When will Postgresql 7.1 be released?
>
> right now, we're looking at October-ish for going beta, so most likely
> November-ish for a release ...
Will there be a clean upgrad
The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 29 Aug 2000, Trond Eivind [iso-8859-1] Glomsr d wrote:
>
> > The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Miguel Omar Carvajal wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi there,
> > > >When will Postgresql 7.1 be released?
> >
On 29 Aug 2000, Trond Eivind [iso-8859-1] Glomsrød wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Miguel Omar Carvajal wrote:
> >
> > > Hi there,
> > >When will Postgresql 7.1 be released?
> >
> > right now, we're looking at October-ish for going beta, so
On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Miguel Omar Carvajal wrote:
> Hi there,
>When will Postgresql 7.1 be released?
right now, we're looking at October-ish for going beta, so most likely
November-ish for a release ...
Hi there,
When will Postgresql 7.1 be released?
Miguel
25 matches
Mail list logo
