[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) writes: > Will there be a clean upgrade path this time, or > yet another dump-initdb-restore procedure? Still TBD, I think --- right now pg_upgrade would still work, but if Vadim finishes WAL there's going to have to be a dump/reload for that. Another certain dump/reload in the foreseeable future will come from adding tablespace support/changing file naming conventions. > Unclean upgrades are one of major disadvantages of postgresql FTTB, > IMHO. You can always stick to Postgres 6.5 :-). There are certain features that just cannot be added without redoing the on-disk table format. I don't think we will ever want to promise "no more dump/reload"; if we do, it will mean that Postgres has stopped improving. regards, tom lane
- [GENERAL] 7.1 Release Date Miguel Omar Carvajal
- Re: [GENERAL] 7.1 Release Date The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [GENERAL] 7.1 Release Date Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [GENERAL] 7.1 Release Date The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [GENERAL] 7.1 Release Date Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [GENERAL] 7.1 Release Date The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [GENERAL] 7.1 Release ... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [GENERAL] 7.1 Rele... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [GENERAL] 7.1 Release Date Tom Lane
- Re: [GENERAL] 7.1 Release Date Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [GENERAL] 7.1 Release Date Tom Lane
- Re: [GENERAL] 7.1 Release ... Sander Steffann
- Re: [GENERAL] 7.1 Release ... Elmar Haneke
- RE: [GENERAL] 7.1 Release Date Bill Barnes
- Re: [GENERAL] 7.1 Release Date Lamar Owen
- Re: [GENERAL] 7.1 Release Date Bruce Momjian
- Re: [GENERAL] 7.1 Release Date Jim Mercer
- Re: [GENERAL] 7.1 Release Date Bruce Momjian
- Re: [GENERAL] 7.1 Release Date Jim Mercer