bytes
Max nice priority 00
Max realtime priority 00
Max realtime timeout unlimitedunlimited
us
[root@2-NfseNet-SGDB ~]#
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Carlos Henrique Reimer writes:
> > Yes,
014 at 12:05 PM, Carlos Henrique Reimer
> wrote:
> > That was exactly what the process was doing and the out of memory error
> > happened while one of the merges to set 1 was being executed.
>
> You sure you don't have a ulimit getting in the way?
>
--
Reim
can be scripted.
>
> Given you got about 50% done before it failed, maybe even 4 sets of 6000
> tables each may work out.
>
--
Reimer
47-3347-1724 47-9183-0547 msn: carlos.rei...@opendb.com.br
Slony version is 2.2.3
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Scott Marlowe
wrote:
> Just wondering what slony version you're using?
>
--
Reimer
47-3347-1724 47-9183-0547 msn: carlos.rei...@opendb.com.br
(-x) unlimited
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Carlos Henrique Reimer writes:
> > I've facing an out of memory condition after running SLONY several hours
> to
> > get a 1TB database with about 23,000 tables replicated. The error oc
GCC gcc (GCC)
4.4.6 20120305 (Red Hat 4.4.6-4)
(1 row)
Thank you!
Carlos Reimer
follow to identify the root cause
in order to prevent it to happen again?
Thank you!
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Sergey Konoplev wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Carlos Henrique Reimer
> wrote:
> > I have tried to drop the index and the reindex procedure but both fail
&g
directory to the new box.
Hope the error will not be propagated to the new box.
Reimer
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 08/05/2013 06:24 AM, Carlos Henrique Reimer wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Yes, I agree with you that it must be upgraded to a support
, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 08/04/2013 02:41 AM, Carlos Henrique Reimer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a Windows box running Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition
> > Service Pack 2 with PostgreSQL 8.2.23 and getting a server crash while
> > trying
this related with a hardware problem or some operational system issue?
Do a Windows reinstall or an windows upgrade fix the issue?
Thank you in advance!
--
Reimer
as source_t
> , pg_type as target_t
> ,pg_proc as proc
> WHERE
> ct.castsource = source_t.oid
> and ct.casttarget = target_t.oid
> and ct.castfunc = proc.oid
>
> I get 144 rows.
> http://www.rummandba.com/2013/02/postgresql-type-casting-information.html
>
>
&g
It works if I drop the functions but then the select trim(1) does not work;
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 5:38 PM, AI Rumman wrote:
> Drop those functions and try again.
>
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Carlos Henrique Reimer <
> carlos.rei...@opendb.com.br> wrote:
&g
issed that.
> Which version of 9.2 you are working with? I am also at 9.2 and its
> working fine.
> Try out using
> select 'teste'||1::int;
>
> See if it works or not.
>
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Carlos Henrique Reimer <
> carlos.rei...@opendb.co
1-to.html
>
> It'll work.
>
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Carlos Henrique Reimer <
> carlos.rei...@opendb.com.br> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Currently, our application is still using PG 8.2 and we are trying to use
>> 9.2 but there are some
acter: 15
Is there a way to make both selects work on PG 9.2 without explicit casts?
Thank you in advace!
--
Reimer
47-3347-1724 47-9183-0547 msn: carlos.rei...@opendb.com.br
? Don't think so, but...
Basically, the question is: is there a way to guaranty a reliable PG
database in an untrusted and insecure environment? Maybe some kind of file
system could give this guaranty, not sure..
--
Reimer
los Henrique Reimer wrote:
>
> > Anyway it does not seam related to statistics as the query plan
> > is exactly the same for both scenarios, morning and evening:
>
> > Morning:
>
> > Index Scan using pagpk_aux_mes, pagpk_aux_mes, pk_cadpag,
> > pk_c
ample that could help is this seqscan:
explain analyze select sittrib8 from iparq.arript where sittrib8=33;
In the evening:
Fri Feb 8 14:00:01 BRST 2013
QUERY
PLAN
---
:smallint) AND (mes = 1::smallint) AND (codfunc =
29602::bigint) AND (seqfunc = 2::smallint) AND ((tipopgto)::text = '
'::text) AND (codpd > 0::smallint)))
Total runtime: 20054.851 ms
(5 rows)
__
We initially suspected the reason could be that in the morning all data is
in memory and in the evening not all is in memory but as database size is
40GB and memory 64GB I would eliminate this hypothesis . Another reason we
rejected this hypothesis is that even if you run the query two times, both
took almost the same time.
Another possibility is a CPU bottleneck but as there is no indication of
this condition in the performance data collected by sar, top, vmstat we
assume the problem has another origin.
How could we determine why this difference in the response time?
Thank you in advance!
Reimer
= 2::smallint) AND ((tipopgto)::text > '
'::text)) OR ((ano = 2013::smallint) AND (mes = 1::smallint) AND (codfunc =
29602::bigint) AND (seqfunc = 2::smallint) AND ((tipopgto)::text = '
'::text) AND (codpd > 0::smallint)))
(2 rows)
Should it not be the same inside o
ANO ASC, MES ASC, CODFUNC
ASC, SEQFUNC ASC, TIPOPGTO ASC, CODPD ASC;
DECLARE CURSOR
pgipm=# FETCH FORWARD 2 FROM CUR1;
xmax | ano | mes | codfunc | seqfunc | tipopgto | codpd | hrspd |
vlrpd | mesano | tipocalcferias | vlrbase
--+--+-+-+-+------+---++-+++-
0 | 2013 | 1 | 29602 | 2 | R| 0 | 220.00 |
1743.28 | 12013 ||0.00
0 | 2013 | 1 | 29602 | 2 | R|53 | 14.67 |
116.22 | 12013 ||0.00
(2 rows)
pgipm=# select current_time;
timetz
10:51:39.748351-02
(1 row)
pgipm=# rollback;
ROLLBACK
pgipm=# select current_time;
timetz
10:52:13.202640-02
(1 row)
pgipm=#
Thank you!
Reimer
Hi Tom,
Thank you for the analyzes!
No problem, there is no problem to use "select wm_nfsp.*" but as my concern
is to prevent this in the future I think I should apply the fix or is there
a config parameter to abend the backend if it reaches some kind of storage
limit?
Thank you!
R
ks; 8160 free (3 chunks); 32 used
>
> Copy and paste the entire block (including the bits I omitted from mine
> because it's just an example to show you what it looks like).
>
> --
> Craig Ringer
>
--
Reimer
47-3347-1724 47-9183-0547 msn: carlos.rei...@opendb.com.br
Hi,
How is the best way to attach a debugger to the SELECT and identify why is
it exhausting server storage.
Thank you in advance!
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 11/08/2012 11:35 PM, Carlos Henrique Reimer wrote:
> > Hi Craig,
> >
> > work_mem
abled triggers:
tg_nfe BEFORE INSERT OR DELETE OR UPDATE ON "5611_nfarq".nfe FOR EACH
ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE fun_nfarq.nfe('5611', 'NFARQ')
FiscalWeb=#
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 11/08/2012 06:20 PM, Carlos Henrique Reimer wrote:
>
server results in an OUT OF
MEMORY message stopping the backend but preventing the entire server to
stop.
The development team is going to change the SQL join command but my concern
is with other similar SQL commands not yet identified.
Is there a way to make PostgreSQL 8.3.21 server stop memory
ch?
Thank you!
--
Reimer
47-3347-1724 47-9183-0547 msn: carlos.rei...@opendb.com.br
http://www.opendb.com.br/v1/explain.txt
in case some one could identify some improvement that could be done to the
SQL or table structures in order to get better command performance.
Thank you!
--
Reimer
47-3347-1724 47-9183-0547 msn: carlos.rei...@opendb.com.br
quivalent in "UTF8"
pg_dump: The command was: COPY brasil.cidade (gid, "municpio", "municpi0",
uf, longitude, latitude, the_geom) TO stdout;
pg_dump: *** aborted because of error
How can I fix this error?
Thank you!
2010/11/1 Filip Rembiałkowski
> 2010/11/1 C
N1252 and UTF8
New Linux box:
Which --locale and --encoding options should I use for the INITDB command to
have a compatible locale and encoding cluster?
Which --encoding option should I use in the CREATEDB command to have a
compatible encoding database?
Thank you!
Reimer
$libdir/plugins/plugin_debugger.dll'
Is there a way to prevent these messages to happen?
Thank you!
--
Reimer
Hi,
Yes, once correct schema was included in the search_path, VACUUM and ANALYZE
run fine again.
Thank you!
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Carlos Henrique Reimer writes:
> > Yes, you're right! I found out a functional index using this function and
&g
ccb(codtab)
"fk_tit_decb" FOREIGN KEY (codecb) REFERENCES "BRASIL".td_ecb(codtab)
"fk_tit_drem" FOREIGN KEY (codrem) REFERENCES "BRASIL".td_rem(codtab)
"fk_tit_rec" FOREIGN KEY (filrec, seqrec, parrec, subrec) REFERENCES
"BRASIL
"
Hi,
We are facing the following problem in a PG 8.2 server when trying to vacuum
one of our databases:
vacuumdb: vacuuming database "reimer"
INFO: vacuuming "pg_catalog.pg_database"
INFO: "pg_database": found 0 removable, 6 nonremovable row ve
needs to be manually done and as any manual
operation exposed to errors.
Maybe this changed in the new PG releases but it was this way in the past.
Thank you!
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Carlos Henrique Reimer
> wrote:
> &
think another approach. Maybe a
CLUSTER can do the work. Will start a CLUSTER and see if I can check the
progress looking the size of the new table relfilenode. It will probably
have less than 102 GB.
Thank you!
2010/9/5 Alban Hertroys
> On 5 Sep 2010, at 12:13, Carlos Henrique Reimer wrote:
finishes?
Thank you!
--
Reimer
47-3347-1724 47-9183-0547 msn: carlos.rei...@opendb.com.br
-- and use this as a
> base for
> DELETE statement...
>
> 2010/8/30, George H :
> > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Carlos Henrique Reimer
> > wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> We had by mistake dropped the referencial integrety between two huge
> >&g
Seq Scan on posicoes (cost=0.00..8064108.80 rows=380245580
width=4)"
Will this work better that a pl/pgsql as you suggested? Or is there
something even betther?
Thank you!
2010/8/30 George H
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Carlos Henrique Reimer
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
ot; that has not
corresponding row in table "posicoes".
As these are huge tables, almost 100GB each, and the server
hardware restricted (4GB RAM) I would like a suggestion of which command
or commands should be used from the performance perspective.
Column "protocolo" is "p
2013-04-01
(1 row)
template1=# select to_date('01/04/2013 23:59:59','DD/MM/ HH24:mI:SS')
;
to_date
2009-04-01
(1 row)
template1=# select to_date('01/04/2013 23:59:59','DD/MM/
hH24:MI:SS') ;
to_date
2013-04-01
(1 row)
--
Reimer
25, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Carlos Henrique Reimer
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We're facing performance problems in a Linux box running CentOS release 5
> > (Final) and PostgreSQL 8.2.4. I've done some basic checks in the
> > configuration but everything looks fine to
d even so the values for
cached size does not change.
Any suggestions or directions I could follow to discover the reason?
Reimer
--
Reimer
47-3457-0881 47-9183-0547 msn: carlosrei...@hotmail.com
skype: carlosreimer
Hi,
I've a plpgsql function that when called never ends and I would like
to trace the internal function commands and see where is the problem.
How can I trace what the function is doing?
Thank you!
Carlos
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make cha
) exited with exit
code 1
2008-03-31 13:35:12 2: LOG: aborting startup due to startup process
failure
2008-03-31 13:35:13 1: LOG: logger shutting down
What can be done to bring the system up again?
Thank you in advance!
Reimer
',','),'X','.'))
FROM TT_PRE PRE
WHERE PRE.FILPRE = '001'
AND PRE.CODPRE = '2'
AND PRE.FILMAT =
INT.FILMAT
AND PRE.CODMAT =
INT.CODMAT)
ELSE 'Ver Grade'
END
END AS PRECO,
CASE WHEN INT.PROMOC = 'Ver Grade' THEN '
_
Am I missing anything here?
Thank you in advance!
Reimer
> "Scott Marlowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On 10/11/07, Carlos H. Reimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> It=B4s "" but the "query_start" column is refreshed.
>
> > Then the query runs and finishes and the problem is so
> On 10/11/07, Carlos H. Reimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > "Carlos H. Reimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > SELECT * or naming all the columns locks the client
> > > application. Yesterday
> > > > I´ve wrong
> "Carlos H. Reimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > SELECT * or naming all the columns locks the client
> application. Yesterday
> > I´ve wrongly said that when naming all the columns instead of
> using the *
> > the applications did not lock.
>
&
sue in the client, as I´m
able to connect and do the select * in other 8.2.4 servers.
Don´t know what kind of tests I should do to help fixing this problem.
Any suggestions?
Reimer
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
all the other tests
against the SUSE PG 8.2.4 production server.
Reimer
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
same "select *"
into the SUSE and it locked, we discard the possibility of a problem with
the ODBC driver.
Reimer
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
t;ndices:deposito". Apparently is a psql
issue because if we query the pg_attribute the column name appears correctly
as "codigo_deposito".
I'm thinking to install the 8.2.5 to fix this issue. Am I thinking right?
Would appreciate any other suggestions.
Thank you very much in advance.
Reimer
on i686-pc-mingw32, compiled by GCC gcc.exe (GCC) 3.4.2
(mingw-special)
Is there anything I can do to help solve this problem?
Thanks!
Reimer
standards?
Thanks in advance!
> -Mensagem original-
> De: Stephan Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviada em: quarta-feira, 28 de março de 2007 19:23
> Para: Carlos H. Reimer
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Assunto: Re: [GENERAL] Order by behaviour
>
>
> On Wed
han Szabo
> Enviada em: quarta-feira, 28 de março de 2007 19:23
> Para: Carlos H. Reimer
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Assunto: Re: [GENERAL] Order by behaviour
>
>
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Carlos H. Reimer wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We have a PostgreSQL 8.0
lc_collate=pt_BR.UTF-8?
Thank you in advance!
Reimer
ctual time=0.089..0.092 rows=1 loops=
1)
Index Cond: (("outer".codfil = ven.codfil) AND
("outer".sequen = ven.sequen))
-> Index Scan using i_uq_ior_ive on tt_ior ior (cost=0.00..3.93 rows=1
width=38) (actual time=8.524..8.528 rows=1 loops=
1)
Index Cond: (("outer".codfil = ior.filive) AND ("outer".sequen =
ior.seqive) AND ("outer".numite = ior.numive))
Total runtime: 6697.206 ms
(53 rows)
Reimer
Hi,
We have very bad performance issues in one of our
customer PostgreSQL servers and we would
like some suggestions to improve the performance for bulky updates.
When one of the biggest tables has all lines
updated for example, it takes at about 30 minutes for processing. If we drop all
da em: terça-feira, 17 de outubro de 2006 00:02
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Pgsql-General@Postgresql.Org
> Assunto: Re: RES: RES: RES: [GENERAL] Dates rejected
>
>
> "Carlos H. Reimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > To discover if it works this way I´ve chan
> Cc: Pgsql-General@Postgresql.Org
> Assunto: Re: RES: RES: RES: [GENERAL] Dates rejected
>
>
> "Carlos H. Reimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > To discover if it works this way I´ve changed the
> /etc/localtime to relect
> > the following timezone:
&g
outubro de 2006 21:38
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Andreas Kretschmer; Pgsql-General@Postgresql.Org
> Assunto: Re: RES: RES: [GENERAL] Dates rejected
>
>
> "Carlos H. Reimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The problem is related with the to_timestamp func
7
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Andreas Kretschmer; Pgsql-General@Postgresql.Org
> Assunto: Re: RES: [GENERAL] Dates rejected
>
>
> "Carlos H. Reimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > select to_date('16/10/2006','DD/MM/');
> >t
.
Thanks in advance!
Carlos
> -Mensagem original-
> De: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviada em: segunda-feira, 16 de outubro de 2006 16:27
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Andreas Kretschmer; Pgsql-General@Postgresql.Org
> Assunto: Re: RES: [GENERAL] Dates rej
w can we explain the 01:00:00 hour that the to_date function returns for
date 15/10/2006?
Thank you!
Carlos
> -Mensagem original-
> De: Andreas Kretschmer,,, [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nome de
> Andreas Kretschmer
> Enviada em: segunda-feira, 16 de outubro de 2006 13:41
&
tt_teste (datfis) VALUES (
to_date('15/10/2006','DD/MM/') );
ERROR: new row for relation "tt_teste"
violates check constraint "tt_teste_datfis_check"
I´ll
appreciate any help!
Thanks in
advance!
Carlos
Reimer
about this issue.
Reimer
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
ira, 5 de julho de 2006 00:42
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Assunto: Re: [GENERAL] Phantom groups
>
>
> Carlos H. Reimer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I´m planning to migrate from 7.4 to 8.0.7 and I discovered some strange
> > behavi
could I fix it?
Reimer
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
Hello,
During mass inserts, we have some locking contention in tables referenced by
foreign keys. It´s a 8.0.3 box
and I know that 8.1 solved this but I would like to know if there is an easy
and safe way to only apply this patch to 8.0.3?
Reimer
---(end of broadcast
in the future and not visible to my XID?
Thanks in advance!
Reimer
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
one will be 3 (1 and 2 are reserved).
In this case, we could have have lines with cmin 4.294.967.295 and lines
with cmin 3. How are they compared to determine that
rows with cmin 3 are newer than rows with cmin 4.294.967.295?
Thanks in advance,
Reimer
---(end of broadcast
Sorry, maybe I was not clear.
No, it´s not Peoplesoft ERP, it´s a small brazilien ERP software house.
- Original Message -
From: "Bruno Wolff III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Reimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Mark Aufflick" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
change to the Sybase ERP system, comparing only the database features.
Many thanks!
Reimer
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Aufflick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Reimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 10:48 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERA
document with all
enhancements they will have if they migrate to 8.0.6.
Where could I find some documents to help me?
Are 7.4.6 vulnerable in some area?
Security?
Many thanks in advance!
Reimer
Hi,
Does anyone know of any recent comparisons of postgres vs
Sybase?
Thanks in advance!
Reimer
ok,
I fixed it using the dd command and the pg_dump is not complaining anymore,
but can I trust in my database now?
Thanks in advance!
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Reimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, Ma
I forgot to mention postgreSQL version:
7.4.6
Thanks!
- Original Message -
From:
Reimer
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 10:41
AM
Subject: [GENERAL] URGENT! could not
access status of transaction
Hello,
We had some
ontents of table "tt_fin"
failed: PQendcopy() failed.pg_dump: Error message from server:
ERROR: could not access status of
transaction 1768711534DETAIL: could not open file
"/usr/local/pgsql/data/pg_clog/0696": Arquivo ou diretório não
encontradopg_dump: The command was
Hi, When the pg_locks view is used the internal lock manager data structures are momentarily locked and that is why I would like to know if some application is reading the pg_locks view and how many times. Is there a way to discover it? Thanks in advance! Reimer
Yahoo! Acesso
Hello, Pg_dump complains when I use the -Fc option with: pg_dump: [archiver] WARNING: requested compression not available in this installation -- archive will be uncompressed and the dump is not compressed... searching in the list I´ve found that there is something related with the zlib.
Hi, I would like to know how much clustered is a table related to some index How can I discover? Reimer
Yahoo! doce lar. Faça do Yahoo! sua homepage.
Hello, Is there a way do discover when was the last time a table or database vacuumed? Thanks in advance! Reimer
Yahoo! Acesso Grátis
Internet rápida e grátis. Instale o discador agora!
I would like to change to C because it will give us better performance. As it is per-cluster I would have to initib again but what will happen when the dump will be reloaded?
Some characters that we have today in the SQL_ASCII database probably can not be loaded in a LATIN1 database. Am I right
Hi,
I´m trying to post messages in the performance list but they don´t appear in the list.
Whan can be wrong?
Reimer__Converse com seus amigos em tempo real com o Yahoo! Messenger http://br.download.yahoo.com/messenger/
the rule system to make updates go to the base table too (the master piece) like the inserts?
3. Is there not some peformance issues related with the fact of using a table that is an union instead a normal table?
Thanks in advance!
Reimer
Jeff Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
Chris Browne
ExactlyJeff Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
Jim C. Nasby wrote:> Or, for something far easier, try> http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgcluster/ which provides syncronous> multi-master clustering.> He specifically said that pgcluster did not work for him because thedatabases would be at physica
I read some documents about replication and realized that if you plan on using asynchronous replication, your application should be designed from the outset with that in mind because asynchronous replication is not something that can be easily added on after the fact.
Am I right?
Reimer
Hello,
Currently we have only one database accessed by the headquarter and two branches but the performance in the branches is very poor and I was invited to discover a way to increase it.
One possible solution is replicate the headquarter DB into the two branches.
I read about slony-i, but
created somewhere after this commands. It´s like the execution order is wrong.
I used pg_dumpall withou any options to create the dump.
What could be wrong?
Reimer
Yahoo! Acesso Grátis - Internet rápida e grátis. Instale o discador do Yahoo! agora.
I thought I just answered this a day or two ago. Check out freshmeat.net for
pgaccess. It's a TCL program that looks real similar to MS Access but is for
contacting PostgreSQL databases. Runs on Unix and Windows.
HTH,
Fred Reimer
On Fri, 11 Apr 2036, "Germán" Largo Urr
91 matches
Mail list logo
