Re: [GENERAL] How to get joins to work

2006-11-04 Thread Anonymous
Please note that natural joins may be dangerous in production code. See the following thread for more detailed information... http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=440287 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

[GENERAL] Import Benchmark

2001-02-05 Thread Anonymous
Hi there, I am trying to find if importing a very large text file is faster with postgresql or mysql (with mysqlimport). Each night the transaction system we used dumps a very large text file which must be loaded into a database, the speed is very important, mysqlimport takes less than an hour. I

Re: [GENERAL] Questions regarding OID

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
Each record has an oid, which is assured to be unique in that database. Thus you can use it for your purpose, I believe. To fine the oid with any record, just: SELECT oid,* from mytable; The OID is always there, and you don't have to add it - you just don't see it uless you specifically ask

Re: [GENERAL] decimal(9.2)

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Sorry, yes you need 6.5 for the general numeric type. H.P. On 25-Jun-99 Herbert Liechti wrote: > Hans Peter Würmli wrote: > >> Try: >> >> dbhpw=> create table therbert (num numeric(9,2)); > > Is not working. I got the following error: > > db=> create table therbert (num numeric(9,2)); > ERROR

Re: [GENERAL] problem with PostgreSQL 6.5 on Linux [solved]

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
On Sat, 26 Jun 1999, M Simms wrote: > > > > after installing pgsql-6.5 ( on a machine with pgsql-6.4.2 installed and > > running ), initdb creates a PG_VERSION file that still reports 6.4; > > subsequent psql connections fail to connect, complaining about "no > > compatible version of postgres fo

Re: [GENERAL] problem with PostgreSQL 6.5 on Linux

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
> > after installing pgsql-6.5 ( on a machine with pgsql-6.4.2 installed and > running ), initdb creates a PG_VERSION file that still reports 6.4; > subsequent psql connections fail to connect, complaining about "no > compatible version of postgres found". > > before you ask: > yes, ive made sure

Re: [GENERAL] problem with PostgreSQL 6.5 on Linux

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
On Fri, 25 Jun 1999, Dan Wilson wrote: > I ran into the same problem and it turned out to be an outdated version of > psql. Check your path to see if you are accessing the correct version of > psql, pg_dump etc.. it is; ive made sure of that. stripped all the permissions off of the entire 6.4.

Re: [GENERAL] problem with PostgreSQL 6.5 on Linux

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
I ran into the same problem and it turned out to be an outdated version of psql. Check your path to see if you are accessing the correct version of psql, pg_dump etc.. -Dan Wilson - Original Message - From: Howie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: postgres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [GENERAL] decimal(9.2)

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Hans Peter Würmli wrote: > Try: > > dbhpw=> create table therbert (num numeric(9,2)); Is not working. I got the following error: db=> create table therbert (num numeric(9,2)); ERROR: NUMERIC scale 2 must be zero I use PostgreSQL 6.4.0 on i586-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc egcs-2.91.6 Any oth

RE: [GENERAL] decimal(9.2)

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
What version of PostgreSQL? Version 6.5 is needed for complete decimal and number support. > -Original Message- > From: Herbert Liechti [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 25, 1999 10:59 AM > To: postgres > Subject: [GENERAL] decimal(9.2) > > Hello > > How do I defin

RE: [GENERAL] decimal(9.2)

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Try: dbhpw=> create table therbert (num numeric(9,2)); H.P. On 25-Jun-99 Herbert Liechti wrote: > Hello > > How do I define the datatype decimal(9.2). I searched the documentation > but the only thing I found was the money data type which is in my case > not very usefull. > > Is there a way t

[GENERAL] decimal(9.2)

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Hello How do I define the datatype decimal(9.2). I searched the documentation but the only thing I found was the money data type which is in my case not very usefull. Is there a way to declare a datatype with 2 decimal places and with a fixed precision? Thanks for your help Herbie -- ~

Re: [GENERAL] What does this mean ?

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
> I really need help here, because i really need this thing working with > transactions. Just in case here is the code: > > pg_Exec($conn, "abort"); > $result = @pg_Exec($conn, "begin"); > if (!$result); > $msg ="sac-pcgra (2):".addslashes(pg_ErrorMessage($conn)); > $msg = chop($msg); >

Re: [GENERAL] Questions regarding OID

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
> Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 23:00:25 +0800 (PHT) > From: Richi Plana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Precedence: bulk > > Hi, > > I'm trying to use PostgreSQL data type oid and I have a couple of > questions about it: > >

Re: [GENERAL] Questions regarding OID

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Richi Plana wrote: > I'm trying to use PostgreSQL data type oid and I have a couple > 2) Can it be used together with NOT NULL or PRIMARY KEY? oid data type is a 4 byte integer and as far as I know can be used pretty much the same way.

Re: [GENERAL] What does this mean ?

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
You have already started a transaction and haven't yet finished it. E.g. psql template; BEGIN; BEGIN; Mario Jorge Nunes Filipe wrote: > > Hi > > I am receiving this message when doing a begin: > > NOTICE: BeginTransactionBlock and not in default state. > > What does this mean ? > -- >

[GENERAL] Questions regarding OID

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Hi, I'm trying to use PostgreSQL data type oid and I have a couple of questions about it: 1) (Most important) Where can I find documentation covering the use of OIDs in PostgreSQL? The only doc which discusses it somewhat that I've seen is the FAQ (and it just tells people what OIDs are) 2) Can

[GENERAL] What does this mean ?

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Hi I am receiving this message when doing a begin: NOTICE: BeginTransactionBlock and not in default state. What does this mean ? -- Mario Filipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://neptuno.sc.uevora.pt/~mjnf S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [GENERAL] *Old* PostgreSQL version

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
> Bruce Momjian writes: > > > > database_name=> select version(); > > > WARN:parser: Syntax error at or near "version" > > > > > > What else can I do? I can see from the dates of the files that it was > > > installed sometime in mid-1997. What else can I use to find the > > > version? > >

Re: [GENERAL] *Old* PostgreSQL version

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
> Hi! > > I read in the FAQ that in order to find out the version of PostgreSQL > I'm running I have to so "select version();" from psql. I have a very > old installation of PostgreSQL that I need to upgrade, so I need to > find out its version, but this trick doesn't work: > > database_name=> s

Re: [GENERAL] Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 09:56:12 +0200

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
> Legacy apps, Bruce. Sometimes you come across tables with ten fields in the > index. I'm working on a (fairly specialised) system now where the primary > key of one of the tables has twenty-four fields in it. It is a summary > table, and probably not the best design, but that's the way it is,

Re: [GENERAL] Limitation

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
> So lets have a look at everything again. Consider it a users wish list for > 7.0 > > 1. The 7 field index limit. Doubtless someone made a decision back in the > dark ages that no-one would ever need > more than that. > > 2. Ruleplan overflows. maybe fixing this is just changing a #define to >

[GENERAL] RE: Limitations

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
> >>> > I've been attempting to port applications from Pervasive SQL to PG. > >>> > Pervasive is interesting because it runs on top of btrieve. This allow > >>> > legacy apps > >>> > and SQL systems to co-exist. It's quirky and buggy, but it's better than PG > >>> > because it can do the following

[GENERAL] A few queries

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
Hi I have just installed 6.5, and I have a couple of questions that I cannot find the answer to in the documentation. Firstly, I am using temporary tables for a number of operations. Is there a way to direct postgresql to keep these in memory for fast access, or will it do this anyway? Secondly

[GENERAL] Date time insertion

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
I am trying to insert both the date and the time into a datetime field. If the field datetime in table v1 is dt, then the following successfully inserts the date into the datetime field: insert into v1 (date) values ('19990401') ; However, if I also wanted to retain the time of day, the follow

[GENERAL] ERROR: typeidTypeRelid: Invalid type - oid = 0

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
I've read many postings of people having this same problem, which I am now having since I've updated to LinuxPPC R5. At this point I've compiled a completely NEW database from scratch (with no problems) and, following right along in the install docs, run %initdb, %createdb, %psql (and then the "se

Re: [GENERAL] ERROR: typeidTypeRelid: Invalid type - oid = 0

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
"Matt Magoffin (Borders Online)" wrote: > > I've read many postings of people having this same problem, which I am now > having since I've updated to LinuxPPC R5. At this point I've compiled a > completely NEW database from scratch (with no problems) and, following right > along in the install do

Re: [GENERAL] insert into view !!

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
On Wed, 23 Jun 1999, abdelkrim wrote: > it is possible to insert into a view ? if its a single-table view, yes -- you'd want to create a DO INSTEAD rule. consult the manual/html pages to get the proper syntax for CREATE RULE. if its a multitable view, maybe... i dont think this can be done with

[GENERAL] insert into view !!

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
it is possible to insert into a view ? thanks

[GENERAL] PostgreSQL 6.5 binaries for Win32 available ?

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
Constantin Teodorescu FLEX Consulting Braila,ROMANIA

[GENERAL] RE: [INTERFACES] Arrays in PostgreSQL

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
In JDBC2 you do have the notion of arrays, but I've yet to get to them. The only real way is to convert the Double[] to a string using PostgreSQL's array syntax (which I can't remember what it looks like at the moment), then store it using PreparedStatement.setString() Peter Peter -- Peter Mou

[GENERAL] No rule to make target 'util/SUBSYS.o'. Stop.

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
Like, I think this got lost somehow, 'cuz it never showed up as far as I saw... Otherwise, sorry for the repost. Well, I decided to go ahead and install 6.4.2 after hitting a wall with 6.3.2 (6.5 wasn't out when I downloaded) and am running into a different compilation error: gmake[3]: Leaving

[GENERAL] Arrays in PostgreSQL

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
Hi, since I have serious problems with some of the features of the JDBC driver I am searching for a different way to store the following structure efficiently in the PostgreSQL database. How can I store an array of double numbers and retrieve it without creating a row for each entry? I read some

[GENERAL] RE: [INTERFACES] JDBC:Using Large Objects

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
The large object code has been working for some time now, however not all of the stream methods work fully. The best thing is to look at the blobtest and ImageViewer examples in the src/interfaces/jdbc/example directory, as they show what methods are currently supported. Peter -- Peter Mount E

[GENERAL] JDBC:Using Large Objects

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
Hi, I am trying to store some Java objects in the PostgreSQL database system. The version of PostgreSQL is 6.4.2 running on a linux sparc machine. The JDBC driver is the one I found in the src/interfaces/jdbc directory. First of all I tried to use the example provided on page 167 of the JDCB int

[GENERAL] pg_dump: "error in finding the template1 database"

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
I recently upgraded my LinuxPPC system, and to make a long story short I had to re-compile Postgres. Unfortunately I could did not dump my databases out (via pg_dump) to files before I had to recompile Postgres. After Postgres was compiled and restarted, I can access the DATA (mostly) but pg_dump

Re: [GENERAL] ?more?

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
At 17:41 +0300 on 22/06/1999, Jeff MacDonald wrote: > When I do a large select , the results all zip past the screen > . How do I make it go page by page ? I figure this has to do > with a term setting, my default term setting is 'linux' . > I tried vt100 and vt220 . > > Perhaps this is a linux-

Re: [GENERAL] ?more?

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
> Do a '\g | more' instead of the ';' at the end of the query. Much easier: > > select * from table \g | more > > Define PAGER, and it is automatically invoked if the data is more than the size of the screen. -- Bruce Momjian| http://www.op.net/~candle [EMAIL PR

Re: [GENERAL] ?more?

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
Jeff MacDonald wrote: > > When I do a large select , the results all zip past the screen > . How do I make it go page by page ? I figure this has to do > with a term setting, my default term setting is 'linux' . > I tried vt100 and vt220 . > > Perhaps this is a linux-ism ? > > Thanks >Jeff

Re: [GENERAL] ?more?

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
Do a '\g | more' instead of the ';' at the end of the query. Much easier: select * from table \g | more -- Aaron Holtz ComNet Inc. UNIX Systems Specialist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "It's not broken, it just lacks duct ta

[GENERAL] ?more?

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
When I do a large select , the results all zip past the screen . How do I make it go page by page ? I figure this has to do with a term setting, my default term setting is 'linux' . I tried vt100 and vt220 . Perhaps this is a linux-ism ? Thanks Jeff

[GENERAL] problem with view

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
Hello, I have some problems with view: ERROR: RelationCatalogInformation: Relation 482442 not found thanks for your help

[GENERAL] No rule to make target 'util/SUBSYS.o'. Stop.

1999-06-21 Thread Anonymous
Well, I decided to go ahead and install 6.4.2 after hitting a wall with 6.3.2 (6.5 wasn't out when I downloaded) and am running into a different compilation error: gmake[3]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/geqo' for i in path plan prep util geqo; do gmake -C $i util/SUBSYS

Re: [GENERAL] regression test failed on 6.5

1999-06-21 Thread Anonymous
> Hi, > > I'm a newbie and have some questions: > > A regression test agaist a new installed 6.5 failed on > items int2, int4 and geometry. It was in Linux 2.0.35. > The posgresql was compiled by: > > $ gcc -v > Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-pc-linux-gnulibc1/egcs-2.91.66/specs

[GENERAL] regression test failed on 6.5

1999-06-21 Thread Anonymous
Hi, I'm a newbie and have some questions: A regression test agaist a new installed 6.5 failed on items int2, int4 and geometry. It was in Linux 2.0.35. The posgresql was compiled by: $ gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-pc-linux-gnulibc1/egcs-2.91.66/specs gcc version egcs-2

[GENERAL] Storing Java Objects

1999-06-21 Thread Anonymous
Hi everybody, Did anyone ever use the possibility of the JDBC driver to store Java objects in the database? -- Best Regards, Steffen Zimmert Steffen Zimmert Fraunhofer Center for Research in Computer Graphics Providence, Rhode Island, USA email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[GENERAL] Problem with perl / postgres

1999-06-17 Thread Anonymous
I've got this simple query... SELECT id, title, summary, datetime, datetime::date AS date FROM poll WHERE id = ? which works from psql but fails with "bad parameter" from perl. If I take out the "datetime::date AS date" bit it starts working. Why would a query work in psql but not perl? -- C

[GENERAL] Two questions about 6.5

1999-06-16 Thread Anonymous
Hello all, I have two questions about PostgreSQL 6.5: 1. CLUSTER does not work on indexes with more than one field. Is this correct? 2. In the distribution tarball, the top-level directory is "postgresl-6.5". Isn't there a 'q' missing? -- Christian Ullrich

[GENERAL] DBMaker

1999-06-16 Thread Anonymous
Does anyone know a product called DBMaker from a company called CASEMaker and would like to tell me about its good and bad points?

[GENERAL] About bug reports

1999-06-16 Thread Anonymous
I have filled and sent bug report about SELECT with LIKE in 6.5 which don't use realy index scaning, but don't see any reaction, even if somebody get my report. Can anybody explain me how can I get information about my bug report? Thanks. Alexander N Shulyak

[GENERAL] PL/pgsql problem in 6.5

1999-06-16 Thread Anonymous
Hi everybody, I have just installed PostgreSQL 6.5 and encountered problems with PL/pgsql: On an insert into a table which has a before-insert trigger I get the following error message: ERROR: Load of file /usr/local/pgsql/lib/plpgsql.so failed: /usr/local/pgsql/lib/plpgsql.so: un

Re: [GENERAL] Rebuilding Primary Key???

1999-06-16 Thread Anonymous
psql database drop index table_pkey; create unique index table_pkey on table (field1, fiel2); \q Tim Perdue wrote: > > How in the world do you rebuild the primary key table in Postgres? > > I've sent a few messages to hackers and don't get much response, but in a > nutshell, there is a pro

[GENERAL] Old Versions?

1999-06-16 Thread Anonymous
I want to configure my new laptop to have the same versions of software as my ISP has, which would mean PostgreSQL 6.3.2 Alas, my attempts to locate a PostgreSQL 6.3.2 gz have been futile. I found a PostgreSQL 6.3.2 diff file, but not knowing what it diffs against, much less actually having the

[GENERAL] Rebuilding Primary Key???

1999-06-16 Thread Anonymous
How in the world do you rebuild the primary key table in Postgres? I've sent a few messages to hackers and don't get much response, but in a nutshell, there is a problem with pgsql in that sometimes you can get duplication in the primary key. I eliminated the duplicates from the table today, but

Re: [GENERAL] initdb in 6.5 not creating 'postgres' db

1999-06-16 Thread Anonymous
On Thu, 17 Jun 1999, Robert Chalmers wrote: > Thats what I thought but when I tried to run the backend to test it with > postmaster -i > It complained that the database 'postgres' didnt exist... I know., use > postmaster -i template1 I suppose? actually, start postmaster as usual. by default, i

Re: [GENERAL] initdb in 6.5 not creating 'postgres' db

1999-06-16 Thread Anonymous
Thats what I thought but when I tried to run the backend to test it with postmaster -i It complained that the database 'postgres' didnt exist... I know., use postmaster -i template1 I suppose? thanks Bob - Original Message - From: John M. Flinchbaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTE

[GENERAL] Success in upgrading to 6.5

1999-06-16 Thread Anonymous
Hi there, I'd like to thank everyone who made the new release happen for the beautiful new features, and above all, for delivering those without stomping on my cherished extended types ;) I'm back in business after a very short downtime. The tables loaded almost twice as fast as they did with 6

Re: [GENERAL] initdb in 6.5 not creating 'postgres' db

1999-06-16 Thread Anonymous
On Wed, 16 Jun 1999, John M. Flinchbaugh wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jun 1999, Robert Chalmers wrote: > > Just installed 6.5, all seems well, but it wont start - claims initdb didn't > > creat the database 'postgres' ... > > whats happening here ? > > initdb only creates `template1'. you have to `creat

Re: [GENERAL] initdb in 6.5 not creating 'postgres' db

1999-06-16 Thread Anonymous
On Wed, 16 Jun 1999, Robert Chalmers wrote: > Just installed 6.5, all seems well, but it wont start - claims initdb didn't > creat the database 'postgres' ... > whats happening here ? initdb only creates `template1'. you have to `createdb postgres' for yourself if you even want the postgres user

Re: [GENERAL] Postgresql v6.5 changes

1999-06-16 Thread Anonymous
Bob Kruger wrote: > > A quick question - > > Last week I compiled and ran ver 6.5 beta2. I noticed that the "up arrow" > key would allow me to easily edit my previous command. In working out a > quick query, I always thought this was a nice feature that MySQL had and > Postgres did not. > > I

[ADMIN] Re: [GENERAL] Postgresql v6.5 changes

1999-06-16 Thread Anonymous
> > A quick question - > > Last week I compiled and ran ver 6.5 beta2. I noticed that the "up arrow" > key would allow me to easily edit my previous command. In working out a > quick query, I always thought this was a nice feature that MySQL had and > Postgres did not. > > I have since downlo

[GENERAL] Update of bitmask type

1999-06-16 Thread Anonymous
Hi, here is a new version of the bitmask type. It supports hash-indices as well now, and fixes a bug in the definition of the <> operator. I would appreciate it if somebody more knowledgable than myself would look over the index definitions. They seem to work and are used by postgres, so

[ADMIN] Postgresql v6.5 changes

1999-06-16 Thread Anonymous
A quick question - Last week I compiled and ran ver 6.5 beta2. I noticed that the "up arrow" key would allow me to easily edit my previous command. In working out a quick query, I always thought this was a nice feature that MySQL had and Postgres did not. I have since downloaded and compiled

Re: [GENERAL] Fw: Can't even specify template

1999-06-16 Thread Anonymous
joel reed wrote: > try configure --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu > > change i686 as needed OK, cool, that worked ... but ... here's what happened next. $ ./configure --host=i586-pc-linux creating cache ./config.cache checking host system type... i586-pc-linux-gnu checking echo setting... checking sett

Re: [GENERAL] HELP needed : COPY datas from file

1999-06-16 Thread Anonymous
Hi! On Wed, 16 Jun 1999, Ming-Hung Eng wrote: > I have a problem to copy datas from unix file, I get the following message > when I try to import > a file with more 20 lines : > > pgReadData() -- backend closed the channel unexpectedly > This probably means the backend terminated abnorma

[GENERAL] HELP needed : COPY datas from file

1999-06-16 Thread Anonymous
Hi I have a problem to copy datas from unix file, I get the following message when I try to import a file with more 20 lines : pgReadData() -- backend closed the channel unexpectedly This probably means the backend terminated abnormally before or while processing the request. We have los

Re: [GENERAL] Notes for SGI Irix users

1999-06-16 Thread Anonymous
> Dear SGI friends, > Please try NOT to compile PostgreSQL (any version) with gcc on Irix. > > Due to a problem in the generation of the code of semaphors and other > structs, any PgSQL binary produced with gcc will be buggy. > More information on this subject at > http://reality.sgi.com/

[GENERAL] Notes for SGI Irix users

1999-06-16 Thread Anonymous
Dear SGI friends, Please try NOT to compile PostgreSQL (any version) with gcc on Irix. Due to a problem in the generation of the code of semaphors and other structs, any PgSQL binary produced with gcc will be buggy. More information on this subject at http://reality.sgi.com/ariel/freeware

Re: [GENERAL] Fw: Can't even specify template

1999-06-16 Thread Anonymous
At 01:32 +0300 on 16/06/1999, Dan Wilson wrote: > I even tried to specify the template with --with-template=linux_i386, but I > get the same exact error message: > ./configure --with-template=linux_i386 > loading cache ./config.cache > checking host system type... configure: error: can not gues

[GENERAL] oid in PL/pgSQL

1999-06-16 Thread Anonymous
Hi, I need the row oid of an insert in an PL/pgSQL function. For explanation: After an insert I call a PL/pgSQL function (by a trigger) and I like to insert into an other table the row oid of the first insert. But I don't know how to get the oid. Thank you for helping, Peter -- CREATE FUNCTION fu

[GENERAL] initdb in 6.5 not creating 'postgres' db

1999-06-15 Thread Anonymous
Just installed 6.5, all seems well, but it wont start - claims initdb didn't creat the database 'postgres' ... whats happening here ? thanks Bob --- http://4qir.quantum-radio.net.au - Where Only The Dedicated Survive! 4QIR Quantum Radio. Bringing you the original sounds of AFVN, with some of t

Re: [GENERAL] Scalability to very large databases under Linux

1999-06-15 Thread Anonymous
M Simms wrote on Tue, 15 Jun 1999 19:58:28 BST >> Dear Folks, >> >> We have been running 6.4.2 under Linux on a dual Xeon box >> with mostly good success. Our current dataset is 20 million records >> of mostly numerical data (56 fields of floats [70%], ints [20%] and >> a few text fields [10%])

[GENERAL] Fw: Can't even specify template

1999-06-15 Thread Anonymous
I can't even get ./configure to work. I just reformatted my Linux box and installed Redhat Linux 6.0. I had 6.0 installed for a while but had installed another distribution (Mandrake) over the top of it. I downloaded pg 6.5 last night and installed it. Everything went fine. So after I reforma

Re: [GENERAL] Problems building pgsql 6.5/6.4 on AIX gcc

1999-06-15 Thread Anonymous
Check AIX faq on the web site. It may help. > Hi! I can't compile postgres 6.5/6.4 on RS6000 (CPU:PowerPC 604 > 333Mhz, AIX4.3, egcs). I have installed bison and flex. > > I'm configuring it with "./configure --with-template=aix_gcc". > gmake all fails with dynloader.c: > >

[GENERAL] Problems building pgsql 6.5/6.4 on AIX gcc

1999-06-15 Thread Anonymous
Hi! I can't compile postgres 6.5/6.4 on RS6000 (CPU:PowerPC 604 333Mhz, AIX4.3, egcs). I have installed bison and flex. I'm configuring it with "./configure --with-template=aix_gcc". gmake all fails with dynloader.c: gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/postgresql-6

Re: [GENERAL] Scalability to very large databases under Linux

1999-06-15 Thread Anonymous
> Dear Folks, > > We have been running 6.4.2 under Linux on a dual Xeon box > with mostly good success. Our current dataset is 20 million records > of mostly numerical data (56 fields of floats [70%], ints [20%] and > a few text fields [10%]). The performance is acceptable, the only > problem

[GENERAL] Large Object Problem with Python interface

1999-06-15 Thread Anonymous
Hi. Im trying to access prostrgeres (on redhat linux 6.0) via pg's LO python interface. With pg 6.4.2 & 6.5b1 everything works fine, but since 6.5b2 (6.5 final incl) following errors occour: [lauri@liha lauri]$ python Python 1.5.2 (#2, Jun 12 1999, 02:51:28) [GCC egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux

[GENERAL] Installation problems with v6.5

1999-06-15 Thread Anonymous
Hi everybody! I tried to install the new version of PostgreSQL an everything worked really fine until I typed in the "postmaster -i" command for the first time. The following error message occured: IpcMemoryCreate: shmget failed (Invalid argument) key=5432001, size=1073152, permission=600 FATAL

Re: [GENERAL] Error message when using perl to connect to Postgres Server

1999-06-15 Thread Anonymous
Make sure your perl DBD-Pg and DBI are compiled with the correct version of postgres. > Erik Colson wrote: > > Hi! > > I installed (compiled) latest versions of Perl, Postgres. > > I can access the database via 'psql' but allways get an error when > trying to connect from a perl-script : > >