Re: [GENERAL] Upcoming Changes to News Server ...

2004-11-24 Thread \"Marc G. Fournier From\"@svr1.postgresql.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Gary L. Burnore") writes: >It appears that his aliiasing hasn't actually taken effect yet. Once it >does, apparently things will be slightly better because he's then sending >posts to pgsql.* not comp.databases.postgres.* .As of a short while >ago, we were still receivin

Re: [GENERAL] Upcoming Changes to News Server ...

2004-11-23 Thread \"Marc G. Fournier From\"@svr1.postgresql.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Gary L. Burnore") writes: >At 07:47 PM 11/23/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > -Original Message- >> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jim Seymour >> > Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 5:18 PM >> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > Subject: R

Re: [GENERAL] Upcoming Changes to News Server ...

2004-11-23 Thread \"Marc G. Fournier From\"@svr1.postgresql.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Gary L. Burnore") writes: >At 05:28 PM 11/23/2004, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >>Jim Seymour wrote: >>>"Gary L. Burnore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>[snip] >>> It's ok. Mysql's better anyway. >>> >>>Was that absolutely necessary? >Of course not. >>Yes. It shows his lack of

Re: [GENERAL] Upcoming Changes to News Server ...

2004-11-23 Thread \&quot;Marc G. Fournier From\&quot;@svr1.postgresql.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Seymour) writes: >Here's another factoid for you. When a new big-8 newsgroup is >approved, an "official" newsgroup creation control message is sent. >Well, somebody *forged* just such a control message for one-or-more >comp.databases.postgresql.* newsgroups. That was *not*

Re: [GENERAL] Testing Gatway to pgsql.* hierarchy

2004-11-23 Thread \&quot;Marc G. Fournier From\&quot;@svr1.postgresql.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Marc G. Fournier") writes: to usenet works, how about back to mail? ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]