[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Gary L. Burnore") writes:
>At 07:47 PM 11/23/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jim Seymour
>> > Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 5:18 PM
>> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Upcoming Changes to News Server ...
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > "Gary L. Burnore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > [snip]
>> > >
>> > > It's ok. Mysql's better anyway.
>> >
>> > Was that absolutely necessary?
>>
>>Was what necessary? (The cheap shot or the fact that he is ill informed? :)
>>
>>For the record, I have both mysql and postgresql installations, and
>>postgresql, even without pgadmin
>>iii, is far superior in MANY ways to mysql.
>Many, maybe. Not all and certainly not more. Of course, ihat's my OPINION
>and I am quite well informed about databases, thankyouverymuch.
>I'm also well informed about running an NSP and what kind of mess Marc is
>now making and that's still the subject of the thread.
As Russ has help'd show on news.groups this evening, you have very littl
understaning of the changes that I've just made ... for someone that runs
a news server, not knowing what "newsgroup aliasing" means seems to be a
relativly key deficiency in knowledge :(
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
