12 jul 2014 kl. 12:33 skrev Andres Freund :
> On 2014-07-12 18:22:30 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> On 07/12/2014 02:24 PM, Martin Gudmundsson wrote:
>>> Any ideas giving BDR an option to be synchronous. I mean in ”close
>>> quarters” with low latency it should work ok.
>>
>> BDR doesn't do sync
Hi,
How performance monitoring/tuning on postgres..?
please let me know some links to learn,
ex-query performence,
i need it ..
thanks in advance,
ramesh
>>
>> I’ve seen some mailing list threads regarding this but was that ever
>> implemented? Do you know where it’s documented?
>
> I don't think the patch ever got accompanying documentation.
>
> It's not mentioned here, anyway:
>
> http://jdbc.postgresql.org/documentation/93/connect.html
>
>
12 jul 2014 kl. 14:48 skrev Andres Freund :
> On 2014-07-12 14:37:02 +0200, Martin Gudmundsson wrote:
>>> It's possible to do it to a streaming replication sync standby, but also
>>> to another BDR node. The logical decoding facility added in 9.4 allows
>>> logical replication solutions to use th
12 jul 2014 kl. 04:58 skrev Craig Ringer :
> On 07/12/2014 02:42 AM, Martin Gudmundsson wrote:
>> Hi all!
>> I was wondering if there are any specific load balancing/failover
>> functionality planned for client drivers connection to a BDR group. In my
>> case the jdbc driver, but could be relev
>>
>> Because BDR is asynchronous multi-master _replication_ though, clients
>> are expected to be aware of some of the anomalies that can occur. A
>> naïve client that just picked a random BDR server and did the next
>> transaction on it would be very likely to cause unwanted replication
>> anom
12 jul 2014 kl. 13:45 skrev Andres Freund :
> On 2014-07-12 13:23:08 +0200, Martin Gudmundsson wrote:
>>
>> 12 jul 2014 kl. 12:33 skrev Andres Freund :
>>
>>> On 2014-07-12 18:22:30 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 07/12/2014 02:24 PM, Martin Gudmundsson wrote:
> Any ideas giving BDR an o
On 2014-07-12 14:37:02 +0200, Martin Gudmundsson wrote:
> > It's possible to do it to a streaming replication sync standby, but also
> > to another BDR node. The logical decoding facility added in 9.4 allows
> > logical replication solutions to use the same mechanism as streaming rep
> > does.
> >
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 07/12/2014 02:24 PM, Martin Gudmundsson wrote:
>> 12 jul 2014 kl. 04:58 skrev Craig Ringer :
>>> PgJDBC actually already supports rudimentary client-based failover.
>>
>> I've seen some mailing list threads regarding this but was that ever
On 2014-07-12 13:23:08 +0200, Martin Gudmundsson wrote:
>
> 12 jul 2014 kl. 12:33 skrev Andres Freund :
>
> > On 2014-07-12 18:22:30 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> >> On 07/12/2014 02:24 PM, Martin Gudmundsson wrote:
> >>> Any ideas giving BDR an option to be synchronous. I mean in ”close
> >>> qu
On 2014-07-12 18:22:30 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 07/12/2014 02:24 PM, Martin Gudmundsson wrote:
> > Any ideas giving BDR an option to be synchronous. I mean in ”close
> > quarters” with low latency it should work ok.
>
> BDR doesn't do synchronous replication _yet_, but it's on the roadmap.
On 07/12/2014 02:24 PM, Martin Gudmundsson wrote:
>
> 12 jul 2014 kl. 04:58 skrev Craig Ringer :
>
>> PgJDBC actually already supports rudimentary client-based failover.
>
> I’ve seen some mailing list threads regarding this but was that ever
> implemented? Do you know where it’s documented?
I
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Ravi Kiran wrote:
> 13)n
In gdb, 'n' or 'next' is used to have the debugger switch to the next
line, if you want to stop automatically to the next breakpoint, use
either 'c' of 'continue'.
--
Michael
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgr
13 matches
Mail list logo
