"Chris Travers" wrote in message
news:CAKt_ZfvZfYq_VPYXG3p=fy=s1whcc0p9trxkczfrrsjsqms...@mail.gmail.com...
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Andy Yoder wrote:
Hello all,
I would like the community's input on a topic. The words "too far out of
the mainstream" are from an e-mai
[ sorry for slow response, but I'd not gotten time to think about this... ]
Sam Ross writes:
> I was wondering why it seems that the query planner can't "see", based
> on the histograms, that two join-columns have a very small
> intersection, and adjust its row estimation accordingly.
The reason
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 6:19 AM, David Johnston wrote:
> On Aug 31, 2012, at 22:49, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> David Johnston writes:
>>> On Aug 31, 2012, at 21:52, Tom Lane wrote:
David Johnston writes:
> That said you might want to try
> SUM(COALESCE(foo, 0))
>>
Actually I'd go wi
[Properly posted to hackers list]
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 02:27:02AM +1100, Brendan Jurd wrote:
> On 1 April 2011 02:00, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> > On Wednesday, March 30, 2011 8:39:25 pm Brendan Jurd wrote:
> >> If we wanted to make it "work", then I think the thing to do would be
> >> to add a ne
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 03:58:48AM +1100, Brendan Jurd wrote:
> On 1 April 2011 03:32, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> > Now I am confused the docs say:
> >
> > D day of the week, Sunday(1) to Saturday(7)
> > ID ISO day of the week, Monday(1) to Sunday(7)
> >
> > This would seem to say they both
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 02:27:02AM +1100, Brendan Jurd wrote:
> On 1 April 2011 02:00, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> > On Wednesday, March 30, 2011 8:39:25 pm Brendan Jurd wrote:
> >> If we wanted to make it "work", then I think the thing to do would be
> >> to add a new set of formatting tokens IDY, IDA
On 09/01/2012 01:24 PM, Peter Bex wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 12:43:15AM +0200, Geert Mak wrote:
>> There is this case studies section as well -
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/about/casestudies/
>>
>> Which appear to me a little old and a little too little, one could try to
>> add more, perh
2012/9/1 Chris Travers :
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Andy Yoder wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I would like the community's input on a topic. The words "too far out of
>> the mainstream" are from an e-mail we received from one of our clients,
>> describing the concern our client's IT g
2012/9/1 Tom Lane :
> Scott Marlowe writes:
>> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Chris Travers
>> wrote:
>>> 1) While MySQL is perhaps better marketed, PostgreSQL is an older project
>>> with a proud heritage (Informix started as a Postgres fork), and top-rate
>
>> Pretty sure that's not true. I
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Scott Marlowe writes:
>> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Chris Travers
>> wrote:
>>> 1) While MySQL is perhaps better marketed, PostgreSQL is an older project
>>> with a proud heritage (Informix started as a Postgres fork), and top-rate
>
>> Pr
Scott Marlowe writes:
> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Chris Travers wrote:
>> 1) While MySQL is perhaps better marketed, PostgreSQL is an older project
>> with a proud heritage (Informix started as a Postgres fork), and top-rate
> Pretty sure that's not true. Ingres is a cousin of Postgres s
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Chris Travers
> wrote:
>
> > 1) While MySQL is perhaps better marketed, PostgreSQL is an older
> project
> > with a proud heritage (Informix started as a Postgres fork), and top-rate
>
> Pretty sure that's not
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Chris Travers wrote:
> 1) While MySQL is perhaps better marketed, PostgreSQL is an older project
> with a proud heritage (Informix started as a Postgres fork), and top-rate
Pretty sure that's not true. Ingres is a cousin of Postgres started
by the same guy, Ston
On 01/09/2012 05:23, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> This email has been sitting in my drafts folder since Sept 20th, 2008.
> Almost 4 years! Getting it off my chest now. I am attaching 2 files for
> this solution I developed, because I don't know which is the correct one
Better later than never! :-) One f
Wandering away from the original topic a little but helpful enough to
continue this line of reasoning here.
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Edson Richter wrote:
>
>> It's an interesting thing.
> We have a product that runs over PostgreSQL without any problems (well, we
> have few, but most of th
On 9/1/2012 6:42 AM, Edson Richter wrote:
Nevertheless, when we present our product to customers, they won't get
satisfied until we guarantee we can run same product with major paid
versions (Oracle, MS SQL, and so on).
I think this is a business problem not a technology problem. Forget
trying
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Andy Yoder wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I would like the community's input on a topic. The words "too far out of
> the mainstream" are from an e-mail we received from one of our clients,
> describing the concern our client's IT group has about our use of
> PostgreSQL
Em 31/08/2012 16:52, David Johnston escreveu:
-Original Message-
From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-
ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Andy Yoder
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 3:25 PM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Cc: Andy Yoder
Subject: [GENERAL] "Too far
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 12:43:15AM +0200, Geert Mak wrote:
> There is this case studies section as well -
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/casestudies/
>
> Which appear to me a little old and a little too little, one could try to add
> more, perhaps.
I noticed that the "Share Your Story" lin
On 31 August 2012 16:32, John Lumby wrote:
>
> ___
>> From: pavan.deola...@gmail.com
>> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 11:09:42 +0530
>> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] UPDATE RULE to be invoked when UPDATE .. WHERE fails
>> the WHERE predicate ?
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 6:31 PM,
20 matches
Mail list logo
