On Saturday 1. October 2011 07.55.01 Leif Biberg Kristensen wrote:
> I've somehow introduced a spurious UTF-8 character in my database. When I
> try to export to an application that requires LATIN1 encoding, my export
> script bombs out with this message:
>
> psycopg2.DataError: character 0xe2808e
I've somehow introduced a spurious UTF-8 character in my database. When I try
to export to an application that requires LATIN1 encoding, my export script
bombs out with this message:
psycopg2.DataError: character 0xe2808e of encoding "UTF8" has no equivalent in
"LATIN1"
I figure that it should
On 09/30/2011 11:41 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 09/30/11 2:09 AM, J.V. wrote:
Some tables have millions of rows,
well, something like UPDATE tablename SET
id=generate_series(1,numberofrows); will update every row to a
sequential value. However, I have no idea how you would match the
foreign ke
On 09/30/2011 06:17 PM, Pietro Laranci wrote:
On the machines are not active firewalls.
Most likely there _is_ a firewall involved, maybe just not one you're
aware of. As Adrian said, check the settings in the standard Windows
Firewall if you're on Windows.
For more troubleshooting: Check
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Cody Caughlan wrote:
> Please see below.
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Scott Marlowe
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Cody Caughlan wrote:
>> > That worked, but "file" shows no difference:
>> > $ iconv -f utf-8 -t utf-8 -c foo.sql > utf.sql
Please see below.
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Cody Caughlan wrote:
> > That worked, but "file" shows no difference:
> > $ iconv -f utf-8 -t utf-8 -c foo.sql > utf.sql
> > $ file -i foo.sql
> > foo.sql: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Cody Caughlan wrote:
> That worked, but "file" shows no difference:
> $ iconv -f utf-8 -t utf-8 -c foo.sql > utf.sql
> $ file -i foo.sql
> foo.sql: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> $file -i utf.sql
> utf.sql: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> So iconv didnt actually con
On 30 September 2011 18:41, Henry Drexler wrote:
> Are you looking for stuff like this?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/functions-window.html
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/functions-string.html
>
> Thanks for reply. Yes, I knew these functions. In fact, I was rather
wo
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Cody Caughlan wrote:
>> Its a Rails app and I do have:
>> encoding: utf8
>
>
> Hmmm, if you try this does it work (mostly)?
>
> iconv -f utf-8 -t utf-8 -c < infile > outfile
If that doesn't work try:
icon
That worked, but "file" shows no difference:
$ iconv -f utf-8 -t utf-8 -c foo.sql > utf.sql
$ file -i foo.sql
foo.sql: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
$file -i utf.sql
utf.sql: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
So iconv didnt actually convert the file OR does is the "file" command just
ignorant?
On Fri
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Cody Caughlan wrote:
> Its a Rails app and I do have:
> encoding: utf8
Hmmm, if you try this does it work (mostly)?
iconv -f utf-8 -t utf-8 -c < infile > outfile
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your su
Its a Rails app and I do have:
encoding: utf8
Set in my DB configuration.
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Cody Caughlan wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Scott Marlowe >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Cody Caughlan wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Scott Marlowe
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Cody Caughlan wrote:
>> > Please see below.
>> >
>> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Scott Marlowe
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Fri,
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Cody Caughlan wrote:
> > Please see below.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Scott Marlowe >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Cody Caughlan
> wrote:
> >> > Thanks Scott. See
Cody Caughlan writes:
> Ok, I see what you mean. This would create a new DB with the proper
> encoding. Which is "fine", and probably what I will do. I guess I see an
> ideal scenario being one where we permanently convert the template encoding
> to UTF8 so going forward I dont have to worry about
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Cody Caughlan wrote:
> Please see below.
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Scott Marlowe
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Cody Caughlan wrote:
>> > Thanks Scott. See below:
>> >
>> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Scott Marlowe
>> >
>> >
Please see below.
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Cody Caughlan wrote:
> > Thanks Scott. See below:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Scott Marlowe >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Cody Caughlan
> wrote:
Scott Marlowe writes:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Cody Caughlan wrote:
>> So it appears both template0 & template1 are SQL_ASCII, so how would
>> creating from a new DB from template0 be any different than template1?
> P.s. I'm not sure why it works, I just know that it does. :)
CREATE
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Cody Caughlan wrote:
> Thanks Scott. See below:
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Scott Marlowe
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Cody Caughlan wrote:
>> > I would like to change my server_encoding which is currently SQL_ASCII
>> > to UTF8.
>>
At 16:12 30/09/2011, Dario Beraldi wrote:
Hello,
I'm looking for some information (guidelines, docs, tutorials,
etc...) about using postgres for OLAP, data mining, data
warehousing. The sort of questions I'm trying to answer are on the lines of
- What tools/SQL commands are available?
- How s
Thanks Scott. See below:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Cody Caughlan wrote:
> > I would like to change my server_encoding which is currently SQL_ASCII to
> UTF8.
> >
> > I have existing data that I would like to keep.
> >
> > From my u
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Cody Caughlan wrote:
> I would like to change my server_encoding which is currently SQL_ASCII to
> UTF8.
>
> I have existing data that I would like to keep.
>
> From my understanding of the steps I need to:
>
> 1) alter the template1 database encoding via
>
> UPD
Are you looking for stuff like this?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/functions-window.html
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/functions-string.html
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Dario Beraldi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking for some information (guidelines, docs, tutorials,
I would like to change my server_encoding which is currently SQL_ASCII to UTF8.
I have existing data that I would like to keep.
From my understanding of the steps I need to:
1) alter the template1 database encoding via
UPDATE pg_database SET encoding = 6 where datname IN ('template0', 'template
Look at doc chapter II.12
2011/9/30, haman...@t-online.de :
> Hi,
>
> I have a table of names, and searches are usually performed on prefix match.
> This could nicely translate into an index search
> Suppose first name is stored as either 'Jim' or 'Jimmy', searching
> ... where firstname ~* '^jim'
On 09/30/11 2:09 AM, J.V. wrote:
Some tables have millions of rows,
well, something like UPDATE tablename SET
id=generate_series(1,numberofrows); will update every row to a
sequential value. However, I have no idea how you would match the
foreign key references in other tables to these new
On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 22:54 -0600, Ben Chobot wrote:
> On Sep 29, 2011, at 4:57 PM, Jason Long wrote:
>
>
>
> > I thought I had read somewhere that Postges could ignore a join if
> > it
> > was not necessary because there were no columns from the table or
> > view
> > selected in the query. Is
I saw a thread where somebody saw icacls.exe being called by the
one-click installer. I'm having the same thing - the installer has
been running for 45 minutes now and is basically going to have to be
stopped because I'm out of time waiting for it. Looking at process
monitor, it is clear that ica
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Dario Beraldi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking for some information (guidelines, docs, tutorials, etc...)
> about using postgres for OLAP, data mining, data warehousing. The sort of
> questions I'm trying to answer are on the lines of
> - What tools/SQL commands are
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011, Vincent Veyron wrote:
You get a lot more : this gives you an interface to Postgresql inside an
Emacs buffer.
Thank you.
Rich
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/p
Hello,
I'm looking for some information (guidelines, docs, tutorials, etc...) about
using postgres for OLAP, data mining, data warehousing. The sort of
questions I'm trying to answer are on the lines of
- What tools/SQL commands are available?
- How should postgres be configured?
- How suitable is
Le mercredi 28 septembre 2011 à 06:07 -0700, Rich Shepard a écrit :
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Vincent Veyron wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure what 'INSTALL INTO ... statements' are, but are you aware
> > of the very convenient 'M-x sql-postgres' in emacs?
>
> Vincent,
>
>I have a SQL major mode for em
On Friday, September 30, 2011 3:17:51 am Pietro Laranci wrote:
> Good morning to everybody
>
> I have a pg9 db to wich i can connect to by local but not from remote. In
> the properties of the postgres db , the port is set to 5300 (not the
> default 5432). I tried to connect in remote with pgadmi
On Thursday, September 29, 2011 8:49:07 am Tendulker, Shivanand G Prabhu (SSTL)
wrote:
> Hello
>
> We are facing a deadlock kind of issue in PostgresSQL 7.4
>
> We have 2 databases with 3 tables each. DB contains about 250 records. We
> observed deadlock when 2 different clients are performing R
You're right, rules are perfect for very limited and narrow cases. And
make it very hard to write complicated queries against. (i.e., updates
that only touch few columns, likewise with inserts).
I'm guessing the upside is that rules are faster then triggers.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list
> -Original Message-
> From: Gregg Jaskiewicz [mailto:gryz...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 5:18 AM
> To: Igor Neyman
> Cc: Ondrej Ivanič; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Rules going away
>
> speaking of DO INSTEAD, for insert/update case. Try using RE
Hi,
I have a table of names, and searches are usually performed on prefix match.
This could nicely translate into an index search
Suppose first name is stored as either 'Jim' or 'Jimmy', searching
... where firstname ~* '^jim';
gets proper result. I had hoped that creating a functional
index on l
Emanuel Araújo wrote:
> found that the problem occurs when the dbi_link makes parsing of a field
> float / double to a text
> field, because when it creates the tables already created with this type of
> data.
I do not understand that.
> Another thing we see is that the problem is not with null
hi, news!
found that the problem occurs when the dbi_link makes parsing of a field float
/ double to a text field, because when it creates the tables already
created with
this type of data.
Another thing we see is that the problem is not with null fields or zero
bytes but with a value of 1.5, no
Good morning to everybody
I have a pg9 db to wich i can connect to by local but not from remote. In the
properties of the postgres db , the port is set to 5300 (not the default 5432).
I tried to connect in remote with pgadmin3 and quantum gis, both give the error
Connection refused (0x274D/
J.V. wrote:
> I need to run a series of stored procedures, what is the best way to
> organize and run.
>
> Ideally would like something like Oracle PL/SQL where I can put all
> methods in one file and create a main() method
>
> then just : select main() to have them all run.
>
> If there is a w
On 30 September 2011 11:20, J.V. wrote:
> For tables that already exist and have a foreign key relationship, is there
> an equivalent alter statement for the statement below?
>
> Does this mean that if table xxx.id primary key value changes, the foreign
> key value will change as well?
They do if
For tables that already exist and have a foreign key relationship, is
there an equivalent alter statement for the statement below?
Does this mean that if table xxx.id primary key value changes, the
foreign key value will change as well?
If this is the case, then would not have to match up all
speaking of DO INSTEAD, for insert/update case. Try using RETURNING
with that and rules ;) Good luck
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
On 09/30/11 1:28 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 09/30/11 1:23 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
convert the fields to bigint which are 64 bit and not likely to wrap
around any time in this century
indeed, this is as simple as ...
alter table tblname alter column id type bigint;
of course, you'll nee
On 09/30/11 1:23 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
convert the fields to bigint which are 64 bit and not likely to wrap
around any time in this century
indeed, this is as simple as ...
alter table tblname alter column id type bigint;
of course, you'll need to alter all the FK fields that refer to
On 09/30/11 1:13 AM, J.V. wrote:
thanks for the help, we have a production schema with 80 tables and a
few of the tables have consumed the max limit for the id field, so I
have to write a program (stored functions would be the fastest way to
do this), that will go and drop the sequence, create
On 09/30/11 12:59 AM, J.V. wrote:
What data types do I have access to in a stored proc?
I cannot seem to find the stored procedure manual.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/plpgsql.html
I am not speaking of database field/column data types, but rather
stored proc data types.
On 09/30/11 12:57 AM, J.V. wrote:
I need to run a series of stored procedures, what is the best way to
organize and run.
Ideally would like something like Oracle PL/SQL where I can put all
methods in one file and create a main() method
then just : select main() to have them all run.
in fu
What data types do I have access to in a stored proc?
I cannot seem to find the stored procedure manual.
I am not speaking of database field/column data types, but rather
stored proc data types.
Regards,
J.V.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make change
I need to run a series of stored procedures, what is the best way to
organize and run.
Ideally would like something like Oracle PL/SQL where I can put all
methods in one file and create a main() method
then just : select main() to have them all run.
If there is a way to do this, please let
On 09/30/11 12:24 AM, J.V. wrote:
What I want to do however is within a stored procedure make a call and
store all tables in a given schema in a list.
so procedure1 calls procedure2 (not sure why this extra level of
procedures, but I'm playing along)
and procedure2 does SELECT table_name fro
Royce Ausburn wrote:
> I'm in the process of testing out Postgres 9.0 for production use.
I've been using it for development
> on my mac, a build from EnterpriseDB. We've just installed a 9.0.5 on
an Ubuntu (Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS)
> machine from a backport from lucid. There's an existing 8.4.8
postg
Yes, I know that one.
What I want to do however is within a stored procedure make a call and
store all tables in a given schema in a list.
Is this something you can answer?
thanks
J.V.
On 9/29/2011 3:25 AM, Richard Huxton wrote:
On 29/09/11 02:33, J.V. wrote:
Is is possible within a store
54 matches
Mail list logo