Re: [GENERAL] Fast request for version checking....

2005-05-29 Thread Christopher Browne
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Mohan, Ross") wrote: > Thanks for taking the time for a thoughtful response. Once > again, I am educated on this list > > I was a bit unclear in original post -- while I *am* planning on > stabilizing my build environment (updatin

Re: [GENERAL] [Pypgsql-users] Timestamp with and without time zone...

2005-05-29 Thread Karsten Hilbert
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 09:55:37AM +1000, Andrew McNamara wrote: > I think so. mx.DateTime objects are just a date and time. While they have > an idea of the current timezone offset, they're neither UTC nor localtime. Well, they are neither themselves. However, if they know how to get from their v

[GENERAL] DBD::Pg for ActiveState Perl on WinXP

2005-05-29 Thread Aly Dharshi
Hello Folks, I hope that you are well. Is anybody maintaining a Windows package for the DBD::Pg driver for ActiveState Perl ? I don't have VC++ and bcc32 isn't going to compile based on the instructions for Win32. If someone has some binaries around and is will to share, I would be very ap

Re: [GENERAL] Fast request for version checking....

2005-05-29 Thread Mohan, Ross
Chris, Thanks for taking the time for a thoughtful response. Once again, I am educated on this list I was a bit unclear in original post -- while I *am* planning on stabilizing my build environment (updating m4, autoconf, compiler, discovering c/cpp/ld flags, etc) my final goal is a (re-)bu

Re: [GENERAL] Audit trail ?

2005-05-29 Thread Mike Rylander
On 5/29/05, Zlatko Matic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello. > > I must have audit trail of all insert/update/delete on several table. I have > several questions regarding that: > > 1. Is it better to have one audit trail table that collects > insert/update/delete of all audited tables, or it is

Re: [GENERAL] Audit trail ?

2005-05-29 Thread Bob
Sorry for short message, but I'm headed out for the weekend. At my places of work we have use both a single table and one table for every table. I personally liked the single table for every table approach. On 5/29/05, Zlatko Matic <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:Hello.I must have audit trail of all i

[GENERAL] Audit trail ?

2005-05-29 Thread Zlatko Matic
Hello. I must have audit trail of all insert/update/delete on several table. I have several questions regarding that: 1. Is it better to have one audit trail table that collects insert/update/delete of all audited tables, or it is better to have separate audit trail table for every audited t