psql> select version();
PostgreSQL 9.6.1, compiled by Visual C++ build 1800, 64-bit
Hi,
We are upgrading our VMware version from 5.5 to 6.5.
Is PostgreSQL version 9.1 to 10.1 compatible on VMware vSphere ESXI 6.5 and
harware version 13.
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-general-f1843780.html
We are upgrading Vmware to version 6.5.
Operating system for virtual servers will not be changing. The other change
that will be happening is VM hardware version which will be upgraded from
current version ( 9 or 10) to version 13.
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-gen
Was this ever fixed?
--
Álvaro Herrerahttps://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
I want to compare the performance of some queries so I created those tables:
*CREATE TABLE reservation1 (room int, name varchar(255), during
daterange);CREATE TABLE reservation2 (room int, name varchar(255),
start_date date, end_date date);*
then:
*INSERT INTO public.reservation1(name, room,
On 03/26/2018 07:03 AM, nmmulla wrote:
We are upgrading Vmware to version 6.5.
Operating system for virtual servers will not be changing. The other change
that will be happening is VM hardware version which will be upgraded from
current version ( 9 or 10) to version 13.
Your compatibility is b
Thanks JD.
Like i said we are not changing OS at all. WE are just upgrading VMWare from
ESXi 5.5 to 6.5 and hardware from version 10 to 13.
We are using Linux 6, 7.
By just upgrading VMWare will it affects the performane of postgres
databases?
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/P
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 1:28 PM, nmmulla wrote:
> Thanks JD.
>
> Like i said we are not changing OS at all. WE are just upgrading VMWare
> from
> ESXi 5.5 to 6.5 and hardware from version 10 to 13.
>
> We are using Linux 6, 7.
>
> By just upgrading VMWare will it affects the performane of postgre
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 01:49:30PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> You should probably ask this question on the VMWare forums since its their
> software that would or would not have the performance improvements.
> PostgreSQL will benefit from any memory and disk-related virtualization
> enhanceme
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 12:46:38PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Was this ever fixed?
Ugh. I have added a reminder on the open item page for v11 as an older
bug:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_11_Open_Items#Older_Bugs
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi, I'm a student and I downloaded postgreSQL to my Mac but I found a problem.
The program does not start, I do not understand why, but that's not what scares
me. The fact is that a virtual user has been created called 'postgreSQL' which
has appropriated all the functions of the administrator us
[Quipment Logo]
Hello,
We have a windows setup for PostgreSQL(Version 9.6).
We have setup replication and PITR on this PostgreSQL server.
For doing some OS migration activity for the PostgreSQL database servers
We created two new replication server and promoted to new master server for the
sam
On 03/26/2018 04:41 AM, Gian mario Caggiu wrote:
Hi, I'm a student and I downloaded postgreSQL to my Mac but I found a
problem. The program does not start, I do not understand why, but that's
Where did you download it from?
What version of Postgres?
How did you install it?
not what scares m
Hi
I try to setup a logging facility and want it to do its work
asynchronously in autonomous transactions. I have read
http://blog.dalibo.com/2016/08/19/Autonoumous_transactions_support_in_PostgreSQL.html
and chapter 47 of the documentation believing those articles are about
the same. However
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:52:53AM +, Amee Sankhesara - Quipment India
wrote:
> Warning : The failed archive command was: copy
> "D:\PostgreSQL\9.6\data\pg_xlog\00010A8800F8.partial"
> "\\10.0.0.35\Archive_Replication\00010A8800F8.partial" |
> copy "D:\PostgreSQL\9.6\da
15 matches
Mail list logo
