Re: Postgresql 11: terminating walsender process due to replication timeout

2021-09-12 Thread Kyotaro Horiguchi
At Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:55:48 +0900, Abhishek Bhola wrote in > So is there any solution to this issue? > I did try to increase the wal_sender_timeout and it broke the pub/sub. > I increased the wal_receiver_timeout and it wouldn't attempt to restart the > subscription until that time elapsed. > D

Re: Postgresql 11: terminating walsender process due to replication timeout

2021-09-10 Thread Abhishek Bhola
So is there any solution to this issue? I did try to increase the wal_sender_timeout and it broke the pub/sub. I increased the wal_receiver_timeout and it wouldn't attempt to restart the subscription until that time elapsed. Due to that, the WAL segments got removed by the time it came up again and

Re: Postgresql 11: terminating walsender process due to replication timeout

2021-09-09 Thread Kyotaro Horiguchi
At Thu, 9 Sep 2021 16:06:25 +0900, Abhishek Bhola wrote in > sourcedb:~$ postgres --version > postgres (PostgreSQL) 11.6 > > Sorry for missing this information. > But looks like this fix is already included in the version I am running. Ok. I'm not sure but there may be a case where too-busy (o

Re: Postgresql 11: terminating walsender process due to replication timeout

2021-09-09 Thread Abhishek Bhola
le in node A increases, it gives the following error. > > > > "terminating walsender process due to replication timeout" > > > > The data volume at the moment being entered is about 30K rows per second > > continuously for hours through COPY command. >

Re: Postgresql 11: terminating walsender process due to replication timeout

2021-09-08 Thread Kyotaro Horiguchi
ubscription features to copy data from A to > B. > > A (source DB- publication) --> B (target DB - subscription) > > This works fine, but often (not always) when the data volume being inserted > on a table in node A increases, it gives the following error. &

Postgresql 11: terminating walsender process due to replication timeout

2021-09-08 Thread Abhishek Bhola
--> B (target DB - subscription) This works fine, but often (not always) when the data volume being inserted on a table in node A increases, it gives the following error. "terminating walsender process due to replication timeout" The data volume at the moment being entered is about 3

Re: terminating walsender process due to replication timeout

2019-05-30 Thread AYahorau
reality? Best regards, Andrei From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI To: ayaho...@ibagroup.eu, Cc: pgsql-gene...@postgresql.org, rene.romer...@gmail.com Date: 24/05/2019 09:42 Subject:Re: terminating walsender process due to replication timeout Hello. At Fri, 17 May 2019 11:04:58 +0300

Re: terminating walsender process due to replication timeout

2019-05-23 Thread Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Hello. At Fri, 17 May 2019 11:04:58 +0300, ayaho...@ibagroup.eu wrote in > Can frequent database operations cause getting a standby server behind? Is > there a way to avoid this situation? > I checked that walsender works well in my test if I set > wal_sender_timeout at least to 5 second. It

Re: terminating walsender process due to replication timeout

2019-05-23 Thread Achilleas Mantzios
command from a file which  contains 200 (2 million) entries. And in case when I run for example such a command: UPDATE table1 SET a='1' or such a command: DELETE FROM table1; I see in PostgreSQL log the an entry: terminating walsender process due to replication timeout. I suppose

Re: terminating walsender process due to replication timeout

2019-05-23 Thread AYahorau
million) entries. And in case when I run for example such a command: UPDATE table1 SET a='1' or such a command: DELETE FROM table1; I see in PostgreSQL log the an entry: terminating walsender process due to replication timeout. I suppose that this issue caused by small value of wal_sender_

Re: terminating walsender process due to replication timeout

2019-05-17 Thread AYahorau
HORIGUCHI To: ayaho...@ibagroup.eu, Cc: rene.romer...@gmail.com, pgsql-gene...@postgresql.org Date: 16/05/2019 10:36 Subject:Re: terminating walsender process due to replication timeout Hello. At Wed, 15 May 2019 10:04:12 +0300, ayaho...@ibagroup.eu wrote in > Hello, >

Re: terminating walsender process due to replication timeout

2019-05-16 Thread Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Hello. At Wed, 15 May 2019 10:04:12 +0300, ayaho...@ibagroup.eu wrote in > Hello, > Thank You for the response. > > Yes that's possible to monitor replication delay. But my questions were > not about monitoring network issues. > > I use exactly wal_sender_timeout=1s because it allows to dete

Re: terminating walsender process due to replication timeout

2019-05-15 Thread AYahorau
? If it is so, why I do I face this problem again? Thank you in advance. Best regards, Andrei From: Rene Romero Benavides To: ayaho...@ibagroup.eu, Cc: Postgres General Date: 14/05/2019 20:12 Subject: Re: terminating walsender process due to replication timeout To d

Re: terminating walsender process due to replication timeout

2019-05-14 Thread Rene Romero Benavides
plenty of long-running queries which lead to the > databases desynchronization: > terminating walsender process due to replication timeout > > Here is the output in debug mode: > 2019-05-13 13:21:33 FET 0 DEBUG: sending replication keepalive > 2019-05-13 13:21:34 FET 0

terminating walsender process due to replication timeout

2019-05-13 Thread AYahorau
Hello PostgreSQL Community! I faced an issue on my linux machine using Postgres 11.3 . I have 2 nodes in db cluster: master and standby. I tried to perform a plenty of long-running queries which lead to the databases desynchronization: terminating walsender process due to replication timeout