reg_pg_stef...@perfexpert.ch writes:
> However, I poked around a little bit, and this does not seem to solve
> all potential use cases, when I modify the simplified test by deferring
> the lookup to be done inside the loop as an extra lookup instead of
> doing it directly in the loop (whether th
On 12.05.2021 05:42, Tom Lane wrote:
If you're in a position to apply the patch and see if it resolves
your real non-simplified case, that would be very helpful.
Also, this fix in principle will create a small performance
penalty for FOR-loops in non-atomic contexts such as DO loops.
It'd be int
reg_pg_stef...@perfexpert.ch writes:
> it run into an issue with: ERROR: no known snapshots
Hi! This has been reported before, but I'm embarrassed to say that
the previous report seems to have fallen between the cracks.
I've created a patch [1] that resolves your example as presented.
If you're
