reg_pg_stef...@perfexpert.ch writes: > However, I poked around a little bit, and this does not seem to solve > all potential use cases, when I modify the simplified test by deferring > the lookup to be done inside the loop as an extra lookup instead of > doing it directly in the loop (whether that makes sense is another > question) , then this still produces the error:
Ugh. Thanks for the test case!
regards, tom lane
