Am Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 11:29:50PM + schrieb Shaozhong SHI:
> How about knock unique words into discrete joint up strings? Then check
> whether there is any repeated words?
Does it work when you try ?
Karsten
--
GPG 40BE 5B0E C98E 1713 AFA6 5BC0 3BEA AC80 7D4F C89B
Thank you, I learned everything I needed to know.
--
Regards, Dmitry!
ср, 2 февр. 2022 г. в 11:36, David G. Johnston :
>
>
> On Tuesday, February 1, 2022, Дмитрий Иванов
> wrote:
>
>>
DEFAULT VALUE <> GENERATED ALWAYS AS STORED
the DEFAULT value is not recalculated when the refer
On Tuesday, February 1, 2022, Дмитрий Иванов wrote:
>
>>>
>>> DEFAULT VALUE <> GENERATED ALWAYS AS STORED
>>> the DEFAULT value is not recalculated when the reference column are
>>> changed. is not an identical construction GENERATED ALWAYS AS STORED
>>>
>>> *reply:*
>>> They are in a separate li
>
>
>>
>> DEFAULT VALUE <> GENERATED ALWAYS AS STORED
>> the DEFAULT value is not recalculated when the reference column are
>> changed. is not an identical construction GENERATED ALWAYS AS STORED
>>
>> *reply:*
>> They are in a separate list “Methods”.
>> This approach was used for other databases
On Tuesday, February 1, 2022, Дмитрий Иванов wrote:
> ср, 2 февр. 2022 г. в 09:19, David G. Johnston >:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 8:15 PM Дмитрий Иванов
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Why are COLUMN GENERATED ALWAYS AS called "methods" and singled out as a
>>> separate field type?
>>>
>>
>> This sounds lik
ср, 2 февр. 2022 г. в 09:19, David G. Johnston :
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 8:15 PM Дмитрий Иванов
> wrote:
>
>> Why are COLUMN GENERATED ALWAYS AS called "methods" and singled out as a
>> separate field type?
>>
>
> This sounds like you are describing something written. Can you provide a
> link t
The only statement I see on the target DB log is
"logical replication apply worker for subscription ""sub_omx_archive_tci""
has started",""
I don't see the logical replication table synchronization worker started
for any of the tables in this subscription as I see in the other one.
Is the
On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 8:15 PM Дмитрий Иванов wrote:
> Why are COLUMN GENERATED ALWAYS AS called "methods" and singled out as a
> separate field type?
>
This sounds like you are describing something written. Can you provide a
link to where that is?
Is there a common name in the community for t
Good afternoon.
There are a couple of questions that I come back to from time to time:
Why are COLUMN GENERATED ALWAYS AS called "methods" and singled out as a
separate field type?
Is there a common name in the community for the approach in which the data
schema is presented as data?
--
Regards, Dm
Hi Abishek,
Have you checked the subscriber and publisher database log files to see if
there is a problem blocking the subscription? For example, a subscribed
table missing a column that exists in the publisher.
Cheers,
Steve
On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 1:26 PM Abhishek Bhola <
abhishek.bh...@japann
I have 2 sets of publication/subscription between my 2 DBs.
One of them is working fine and the other one is stuck at initializing
state for all the tables.
sourcedb=# select * from pg_publication;
oid |pubname | pubowner | puballtables | pubinsert |
pubupdate | pubdelete | pubt
On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 at 17:10, Shaozhong SHI wrote:
> There is a short of a function in the standard Postgres to do the
> following:
>
> It is easy to count the number of occurrence of words, but it is rather
> difficult to count the number of occurrence of phrases.
>
> For instance:
>
> A cell of
On Thursday, 27 January 2022, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 5:23 PM Merlin Moncure wrote:
> >
> > with s as (select 'Hello World Hello World' as sentence)
> > select
> > phrase,
> > array_upper(string_to_array((select sentence from s), phrase), 1) -
> > 1 as occurrances
> >
=?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber=2C_Franz-Josef_=28StMUK=29?=
writes:
> I discovered that extensions have owners (pg_extension.extowner).
Yup.
> This seems to be badly supported:
> · postgres does not seem to have support for something like ALTER
> EXTERNSION OWNER TO ...
> · pg_du
Hello,
I discovered that extensions have owners (pg_extension.extowner).
The pgadmin4 schema diff ... well er, kind of tried to report to me that the
owners differ (https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/7145).
This seems to be badly supported:
· postgres does not seem to have support f
15 matches
Mail list logo